Vector Transmission Heterogeneity and the Population Dynamics and Control of Lymphatic Filariasis
- 1 January 2010
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 673, 13-31
Abstract
Along-standing gap in lymphatic filariasis epidemiology is quantifying the potential effect that heterogeneous infection processes occurring in the major mosquito vector genera may have on parasite transmission and control. Although previous studies have focussed on examining the forms of the density dependent mechanisms regulating larval infection in various mosquito genera, there has been little work done thus far in investigating how such differential processes might interact with density-dependent processes occurring in other stages of the parasite life cycle to influence overall transmission dynamics between areas exposed to different transmitting vector populations. Here, we explore the impact that differences in vector genus-related larval infection dynamics may have on filariasis transmission and control using newly derived parasite transmission models incorporating the forms of the density-dependent processes regulating larval infection in the two major vectors transmitting filariasis, viz. culicine and anopheline mosquitoes. The key finding in this work is that filarial infection thresholds, system resilience, transmission dynamics and parasite response to control efforts, can all be influenced by the prevailing transmitting mosquito genus. In particular, we show that infection thresholds may be raised, system resilience to perturbations lowered and effects of repeated mass treatments in eliminating infection enhanced in anopheline filariasis compared to culicine filariasis, as a direct result of the occurrence and action of multiple positive density-dependent mechanisms influencing infection in this vector-parasite system, such as the “facilitation” function regulating larval infection dynamics in the vector and the inverse probability function governing adult worm mating in the host. These findings indicate that anopheline filariasis may be easier to eradicate than culicine filariasis for a given precontrol infection level, although the actual intensity of interventions required to achieve eradication may in fact be similar to that for culicine filariasis because of the higher infection levels generated as a result of the “facilitation” process in Anopheles transmission areas.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complex Ecological Dynamics and Eradicability of the Vector Borne Macroparasitic Disease, Lymphatic FilariasisPLOS ONE, 2008
- Multiple Allee effects and population managementTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2007
- Transmission dynamics of lymphatic filariasis: vector‐specific density dependence in the development of Wuchereria bancrofti infective larvae in mosquitoesMedical and Veterinary Entomology, 2006
- Mathematical models and lymphatic filariasis control: endpoints and optimal interventionsTrends in Parasitology, 2006
- EPIFIL: The development of an age-structured model for describing the transmission dynamics and control of lymphatic filariasisEpidemiology and Infection, 2000
- Nonlinearities in the Dynamics of Indirectly-Transmitted Infections (or, does having a Vector make a Difference?)1995
- Density-dependent processes in the transmission of human onchocerciasis: relationship between the numbers of microfilariae ingested and successful larval development in the simuliid vectorParasitology, 1995
- Does facilitation imply a threshold for the eradication of lymphatic filariasis?Parasitology Today, 1992
- An Assessment of the Use of Stability Analyses in Population EcologyJournal of Animal Ecology, 1980
- Togetherness among Schistosomes: its effects on the dynamics of the infectionMathematical Biosciences, 1977