Distributional differences in the time horizon of executive compensation
Open Access
- 22 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Empirical Economics
- Vol. 62 (1) , 157-186
Abstract
The aim of executive compensation plans is to incentivize executives to maximize long-term firm value. Past research shows that executives’ pay is determined by short-term stock performance to a substantial degree. This paper tests for distributional differences in the time horizon of the performance–pay relation, controlling for executive-firm fixed effects in a quantile regression framework. I identify short-term and long-term firm and industry performance using a filter and estimate distributional differences in the short-term and long-term performance–pay relation using method of moments–quantile regression (Machado and Santos Silva in J Econ 213:145–173, 2019). I find the right tail of the conditional total compensation distribution has a more long-term-oriented performance–pay relation than the left tail. By contrast, the right tail of the conditional accumulated wealth distribution has more short-term-oriented performance–pay relation than the left tail. Results show that asymmetry in short-term firm performance–pay relations may exist, but do not vary across the conditional distribution.Keywords
Funding Information
- Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- The stability of big-five personality traitsEconomics Letters, 2012
- CEO CompensationAnnual Review of Financial Economics, 2010
- Lucky CEOs and Lucky DirectorsThe Journal of Finance, 2010
- CEO Pay‐For‐Performance Heterogeneity Using Quantile RegressionFinancial Review, 2010
- Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation?☆Journal of Financial Economics, 2008
- The Difference That CEOs Make: An Assignment Model ApproachAmerican Economic Review, 2008
- Asymmetric benchmarking in compensation: Executives are rewarded for good luck but not penalized for badJournal of Financial Economics, 2006
- Pay without PerformanceAcademy of Management Perspectives, 2006
- VALUE MAXIMIZATION, STAKEHOLDER THEORY, AND THE CORPORATE OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONJournal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2001
- Moral Hazard and ObservabilityThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1979