Translating a Thin-Film Rehydration Method to Microfluidics for the Preparation of a SARS-CoV-2 DNA Vaccine: When Manufacturing Method Matters
Authors:
- Allegra PelettaAPAllegra Peletta
- Eakachai PrompetcharaEPEakachai Prompetchara
- Kittipan TharakhetKTKittipan Tharakhet
- Papatsara KaewpangPKPapatsara Kaewpang
- Supranee BuranapraditkunSBSupranee Buranapraditkun
- Nongnaphat YostreratNYNongnaphat Yostrerat
- Suwimon ManopwisedjaroenSMSuwimon Manopwisedjaroen
- Arunee ThitithanyanontATArunee Thitithanyanont
- Jonathan AvaroJAJonathan Avaro
- Leonard KrupnikLKLeonard Krupnik
- Antonia NeelsANAntonia Neels
- Kiat RuxrungthamKRKiat Ruxrungtham
Open Access
- 7 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Pharmaceutics
- Vol. 14 (7) , 1427
Abstract
Previous investigations conducted on a liposomal formulation for a SARS-CoV-2 DNA vaccine manufactured using the thin-film layer rehydration method showed promising immunogenicity results in mice. The adaptation of the liposomal formulation to a scalable and reproducible method of manufacture is necessary to continue the investigation of this vaccine candidate. Microfluidics manufacture shows high potential in method translation. The physicochemical characterization of the blank liposomes produced by thin-film layer rehydration or microfluidics were shown to be comparable. However, a difference in lipid nanostructure in the bilayer resulted in a significant difference in the hydration of the thin-film liposomes, ultimately altering their complexation behavior. A study on the complexation of liposomes with the DNA vaccine at various N/P ratios showed different sizes and Zeta-potential values between the two formulations. This difference in the complexation behavior resulted in distinct immunogenicity profiles in mice. The thin-film layer rehydration-manufactured liposomes induced a significantly higher response compared to the microfluidics-manufactured samples. The nanostructural analysis of the two samples revealed the critical importance of understanding the differences between the two formulations that resulted in the different immunogenicity in mice.Keywords
Funding Information
- Emerging Infectious Diseases and Vaccines Cluster, Ratchadapisek Sompoch Endowment Fund, Chulalongkorn University (764002-HE04)
- Second Century Fund (C2F), Chulalongkorn University (764002-HE04)
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using Liposomes as Carriers for Polyphenolic Compounds: The Case of Trans-ResveratrolPLOS ONE, 2012
- Correlates of Protection Induced by VaccinationClinical and Vaccine Immunology, 2010
- Electroporation of skeletal muscle induces danger signal release and antigen-presenting cell recruitment independently of DNA vaccine administrationExpert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 2008
- Order Parameters and Areas in Fluid-Phase Oriented Lipid Membranes Using Wide Angle X-Ray ScatteringBiophysical Journal, 2008
- Multicomponent Cationic Lipid−DNA Complex Formation: Role of Lipid MixingLangmuir, 2005
- Increased gene expression and inflammatory cell infiltration caused by electroporation are both important for improving the efficacy of DNA vaccinesJournal of Biotechnology, 2004
- Interactions of Hydration Water and Biological Membranes Studied by Neutron ScatteringThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1999
- Phase Diagram, Stability, and Overcharging of Lamellar Cationic Lipid–DNA Self-Assembled ComplexesBiophysical Journal, 1999
- Transmission electron microscopy observations of sonication-induced changes in liposome structureBiophysical Journal, 1986
- Diffusion of univalent ions across the lamellae of swollen phospholipidsJournal of Molecular Biology, 1965