Treatment Decision‐Making Roles and Preferences Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer
Authors:
- Amanda M. GutierrezAGAmanda M. Gutierrez
- Wendy A. Allen‐RhoadesWAWendy A. Allen‐Rhoades
- Hadley S. SmithHSHadley S. Smith
- Isabel CanfieldICIsabel Canfield
- Rebecca L. HsuRHRebecca L. Hsu
- Sarah R. ScollonSSSarah R. Scollon
- Lauren R. Desrosiers‐BattuLDLauren R. Desrosiers‐Battu
- Frank Y. LinFLFrank Y. Lin
- Donald Williams ParsonsDPDonald Williams Parsons
- Sharon E. PlonSPSharon E. Plon
Open Access
- 19 March 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pediatric Blood & Cancer
- Vol. 73 (6) , e70235
Abstract
Background: Decision‐making (DM) dynamics between adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, parents, and oncologists remain underexplored in diverse populations. We examined cancer treatment DM preferences among an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse group of AYAs and their parents. Procedure: We surveyed AYAs with cancer ( n = 75) and their parents ( n = 52) participating in the Texas KidsCanSeq study. Among AYA‐parent pairs, we compared preferred and actual treatment DM roles. We explored associations among DM roles, having pediatric‐to‐adult care transition discussions, and clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. We report AYAs’ and parents’ preferences for involvement in shared decision‐making (SDM) with oncologists about cancer treatment. Results: AYAs’ DM role preferences varied: 44% preferred to equally share DM with parents, 31% preferred AYA‐led DM, and 25% preferred parent‐led DM. Parents who preferred parent‐led DM had younger AYAs than parents who preferred equally shared DM ( p = 0.011). For actual DM, 48% of AYAs reported DM was equally shared, 24% reported DM was AYA‐led, and 28% reported DM was parent‐led. Most AYAs had their preferred role (73%). AYAs’ actual role did not significantly differ from their own or their parents’ preferences (both p > 0.05). Approximately half of AYAs reported recent pediatric‐to‐adult care transition discussions. AYAs’ DM preferences and participation in transition discussions did not significantly differ along clinical or sociodemographic characteristics (all p > 0.05). AYAs and parents perceived high importance across all aspects of SDM with oncologists. Conclusion: In this diverse study population, AYAs desired engagement in treatment DM and SDM. Although specific role preferences varied, opportunities existed to increase discussion around pediatric‐to‐adult care transition.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Cancer Institute (U01HG006485)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG006485)
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Co‐management of communication and care in adolescent and young adult oncologyPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2022
- Cumulative burden of chronic health conditions among adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer: Identification of vulnerable groups at key medical transitionsPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2021
- MyPref: pilot study of a novel communication and decision-making tool for adolescents and young adults with advanced cancerSupportive Care in Cancer, 2020
- Decision-making in childhood cancer: parents’ and adolescents’ views and perceptionsSupportive Care in Cancer, 2019
- Ethical issues in the care of adolescent and young adult oncology patientsPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2019
- Decisional burden among parents of children with cancerCancer, 2019
- Adolescent patient involvement in discussions about relapsed or refractory cancer with oncology cliniciansPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2017
- Preparing childhood cancer survivors for transition to adult care: The young adult perspectivePediatric Blood & Cancer, 2017
- Transition and transfer of childhood cancer survivors to adult care: A national survey of pediatric oncologistsPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2016
- Patient‐perceived facilitators in the transition of care for young adult survivors of childhood cancerPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2013