Recovery of Diadromous Fishes: A Kennebec River Case Study
- 1 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
- Vol. 150 (3) , 277-290
Abstract
The lack of safe, timely, and effective fish passage at dams remains a major impediment to the restoration of diadromous fish species to their historic range and abundance. Because fish passage facilities are often ineffective, dam removal has increasingly been used to restore diadromous species. However, few quantitative studies have assessed the response of fishes to dam removal. This paper documents the long‐term response of multiple fish species in the Kennebec River, Maine, to the removal of two hydropower dams and the installation of upstream fish passage facilities that restored access to historic habitat. Edwards Dam was removed in 1999, and Fort Halifax Dam was removed in 2008. Counts of river herring (Alewife Alosa pseudoharengus and Blueback Herring A. aestivalis), American Shad A. sapidissima, and Striped Bass Morone saxatilis at upstream dams confirmed that these species quickly recolonized the 27‐km, free‐flowing segment of the Kennebec River that became accessible after Edwards Dam was removed. Average counts of river herring increased by 228% after the removal of Edwards Dam and by 1,425% after the removal of Fort Halifax Dam. However, access to a substantial amount of habitat in the Kennebec River is blocked by ineffective passage at the lowermost dam.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do the Fish Return? A Qualitative Assessment of Anadromous Pacific Salmonids' Upstream Movement After Dam RemovalNorthwest Science, 2016
- Migratory Movements of American Shad in the James River Fall Zone, VirginiaNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 2013
- Fish and hydropower on the U.S. Atlantic coast: failed fisheries policies from half‐way technologiesConservation Letters, 2012
- Striped Bass Consumption of Blueback Herring during Vernal Riverine Migrations: Does Relaxing Harvest Restrictions on a Predator Help Conserve a Prey Species of Concern?Marine and Coastal Fisheries, 2012
- The Effects of the Stronach Dam Removal on Fish in the Pine River, Manistee County, MichiganTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 2010
- “Setting the river free”: The removal of the Edwards dam and the restoration of the Kennebec RiverWater History, 2009
- Effects of Dam Removal on Fish Assemblage Structure and Spatial Distributions in the Baraboo River, WisconsinNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 2007
- Distribution of Spawning Activity by Anadromous Fishes in an Atlantic Slope Drainage after Removal of a Low‐Head DamTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 2006
- Effects of a Low-Head Dam on the Distribution and Characteristics of Spawning Habitat Used by Striped Bass and American ShadTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 2000
- Effects of the Spawning Migration of the Alewife, Alosa Pseudoharengus, on Freshwater EcosystemsEcology, 1979