STIGA-IFM: A Kinematically Constrained Inverse Framework for Multi-Seam Subsidence via Adaptive Super-Gaussian Kernels
Authors:
- Felipe Gutiérrez-SepúlvedaFGFelipe Gutiérrez-Sepúlveda
- Petr KoníčekPKPetr Koníček
- Eva JiránkováEJEva Jiránková
- Vlastimil KajzarVKVlastimil Kajzar
Preprint
- 9 June 2026
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The reliable prediction of mining-induced subsidence in deep multi-seam environments is fundamentally hindered by a kinematic contradiction: classical Influence Function Methods (IFMs) impose a Linear Shift-Invariant (LSI) Gaussian kernel that structurally cannot reproduce sharp shear boundaries, pillar relief, or trap-door failures, regardless of parameter tuning. This paper introduces the Spatio-Temporal Interaction and Geometrically Adaptive Influence Function Method (STIGA), a macroscopic phenomenological model of rock mass degradation that redefines the subsidence field as a Generalized Superposition Integral over a Linear Shift-Variant (LSV) medium. The influence kernel evolves endogenously from a diffusive Gaussian profile ($n=2$) to a shear-controlled Super-Gaussian piston ($n>2$) via the Hydraulic Radius ($R_h$), resolving the ``Soft Edge'' artifact without recourse to discontinuum mechanics. Multi-seam interactions are quantified through a Cumulative Extraction Density (CED) that couples surface deformation to the cumulative damage history of the rock mass. Although originally motivated by the need to supply continuous surface priors for numerical model calibration, where sparse, discontinuous monitoring points render the inverse problem under-determined, the calibrated framework proves to be a self-sufficient predictive engine. By anchoring constitutive variables to macroscopic geomechanical clusters, STIGA decouples geometric resolution from parameter dimensionality and generates physically valid continuous surfaces directly from the 3D mine schedule. A hybrid inverse strategy (CMA-ES, Huber Loss) is validated against a 20-year dataset from the \v{C}SM Mine, demonstrating that the framework reconstructs unrecorded subsidence, captures abrupt multi-seam shear ruptures, and outperforms classical literature-constrained models by an order of magnitude in volumetric fidelity.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ground movements modeling applying adjusted influence functionInternational Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2020
- A predictive methodology for multi-seam mining induced subsidenceInternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2017
- Numerical modelling of multistage caving processes: insights from multi‐seam longwall mining‐induced subsidenceInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2016
- Horizontal stress under supercritical longwall panelsInternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2014
- Application of a Generalised Influence Function Method for Subsidence Prediction in Multi-seam Longwall ExtractionGeotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2014
- Prediction of mining subsidence under thin bedrocks and thick unconsolidated layers based on field measurement and artificial neural networksComputers & Geosciences, 2013
- Utilisation of surface subsidence measurements in assessing failures of rigid strata overlying extracted coal seamsInternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2012
- Determination of actual limit angles to the surface and their comparison with the empirical values in the Upper Silesian Basin (Czech Republic)Engineering Geology, 2012
- Trap‐door problem with dry sand: A statical approach based upon model test kinematicsInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1981
- River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principlesJournal of Hydrology, 1970