Assessment of microscopic and molecular tools for the diagnosis and follow-up of cryptosporidiosis in patients at risk
Authors:
- Anofel Cryptosporidium National NetworkANAnofel Cryptosporidium National Network
- Y. Le GovicYGY. Le Govic
- B. SendidBSB. Sendid
- E. FréalleEFE. Fréalle
- 26 November 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 35 (1) , 137-148
Abstract
Cryptosporidiosis is an important though underreported public health concern. Molecular tools might be helpful in improving its diagnosis. In this study, ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrep™ Kit (ZR) and NucliSens® easyMAG® (EM) were compared using four Cryptosporidium-seeded feces and 29 Cryptosporidium-positive stools. Thereafter, ZR was selected for prospective evaluation of Cryptosporidium detection by 18S rDNA and LAXER quantitative PCR (qPCR) in 69 stools from 56 patients after Cryptosporidium detection by glycerin, modified Ziehl–Neelsen (ZN) and auramine–phenol (AP) stainings. The combination of any of the two extraction methods with 18S qPCR yielded adequate detection of Cryptosporidium in seeded stools, but the ZR kit showed the best performance. All 29 Cryptosporidium-positive samples were positive with 18S qPCR, after both ZR and EM extraction. However, false-negative results were found with LAXER qPCR or nested PCR. Cryptosporidiosis was diagnosed in 7/56 patients. All the microscopic methods enabled the initial diagnosis, but Cryptosporidium was detected in 12, 13, and 14 samples from these seven patients after glycerin, ZN, and AP staining respectively. Among these samples, 14 and 12 were positive with 18S and LAXER qPCR respectively. In two patients, Cryptosporidium DNA loads were found to be correlated with clinical evolution. Although little known, glycerin is a sensitive method for the initial detection of Cryptosporidium. When combined with 18S qPCR, ZR extraction, which had not been evaluated so far for Cryptosporidium, was an accurate tool for detecting Cryptosporidium and estimating the oocyst shedding in the course of infection.Keywords
Funding Information
- CHRU de Lille (FR)
- Institut Pasteur de Lille (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (FR)
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of Ziehl-Neelsen staining, auramine phenol staining, antigen detection enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and polymerase chain reaction, for the diagnosis of intestinal cryptosporidiosisTropical Parasitology, 2012
- Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: Review of worldwide outbreaks – An update 2004–2010Water Research, 2011
- Evaluation of Four Commercial Rapid Immunochromatographic Assays for Detection of Cryptosporidium Antigens in Stool Samples: a Blind Multicenter TrialJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2011
- Negative Staining Technique of Heine for the Detection of Cryptosporidium spp.: A Fast and Simple Screening TechniqueThe Open Parasitology Journal, 2010
- Detection and differentiation of Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum by dual TaqMan assaysJournal of Medical Microbiology, 2008
- Cryptosporidium — Biotechnological advances in the detection, diagnosis and analysis of genetic variationBiotechnology Advances, 2008
- Subgenotype analysis of Cryptosporidium parvum isolates from humans and animals in Japan using the 60-kDa glycoprotein gene sequencesParasitology Research, 2006
- Intravenous immunoglobulins in infectious diseases: where do we stand?Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2003
- Development of a TaqMan quantitative PCR assay specific forCryptosporidium parvumFEMS Microbiology Letters, 2002
- Basic local alignment search toolJournal of Molecular Biology, 1990