How Investor Variance Ambiguity Shapes a Firm's Disclosure Commitment
Preprint
- 7 September 2026
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
We study a risk-neutral firm's endogenous disclosure commitment before a fixed-precision signal is realized. A representative investor faces variance ambiguity, and the firm anticipates how disclosure changes the investor's worst-case valuation. Disclosure lowers the date-0 averages of the posterior mean and variance. The lower mean depresses the expected price, whereas the lower variance raises it. Two cases arise: costless disclosure is optimal at every degree of ambiguity, or a unique ambiguity threshold exists, with disclosure below it and nondisclosure above it. Thus, variance ambiguity can generate corporate opacity even when disclosure is costless.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Silence is safest: Information disclosure when the audience’s preferences are uncertainJournal of Financial Economics, 2022
- Uncertainty, Information Acquisition, and Price Swings in Asset MarketsReview of Economic Studies, 2015
- Opaque Trading, Disclosure, and Asset Prices: Implications for Hedge Fund RegulationThe Review of Financial Studies, 2013
- Ambiguous Information, Portfolio Inertia, and Excess VolatilityThe Journal of Finance, 2011
- Ambiguity and Asset MarketsAnnual Review of Financial Economics, 2010
- Maxmin expected utility with non-unique priorJournal of Mathematical Economics, 1989
- Optimal Release of Information By FirmsThe Journal of Finance, 1985
- Disclosure of Nonproprietary InformationJournal of Accounting Research, 1985
- Discretionary disclosureJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1983
- The Informational Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure about Product QualityThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1981