Assessing the methodological quality and risk of bias of systematic reviews: primer for authors of overviews of systematic reviews
Authors:
Open Access
- 30 May 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Medicine
- Vol. 3 (1) , e000604
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bibliometric study of ‘overviews of systematic reviews’ of health interventions: Evaluation of prevalence, citation and journal impact factorResearch Synthesis Methods, 2021
- Quality and risk of bias appraisals of systematic reviews are inconsistent across reviewers and centersJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2020
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions2019
- Minor differences were found between AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS in the assessment of systematic reviews including both randomized and nonrandomized studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2019
- Quality assessment versus risk of bias in systematic reviews: AMSTAR and ROBIS had similar reliability but differed in their construct and applicabilityJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2018
- The risk of bias in systematic reviews tool showed fair reliability and good construct validityJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2017
- Clear or almost clear skin improves the quality of life in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis: a systematic review and meta‐analysisJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2016
- ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developedJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2016
- Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic reviewJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2012
- The evolution of a new publication type: Steps and challenges of producing overviews of reviewsResearch Synthesis Methods, 2010