Cephalomedullary nailing versus sliding hip screws for Intertrochanteric and basicervical hip fractures: a propensity-matched study of short-term outcomes in over 17,000 patients
- 5 September 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
- Vol. 30 (2) , 243-250
Abstract
Background Hip fractures are associated with poor mortality and morbidity outcomes. Controversy exists over what the preferred treatment is between sliding hips screws (SHSs) and cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) for stable intertrochanteric (IT) and basicervical (BC) hip fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare early postoperative outcomes and complications in patients treated with SHS to those treated with CMN in IT and BC hip fractures. Methods We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify IT and BC hip fractures, excluding subtrochanteric hip fractures treated with a SHS and CMN for 2008 to 2016. After propensity score matching, there were 8505 patients in the SHS cohort and 8505 in the CMN cohort. Propensity score-adjusted multivariate regression models assed SHS as an independent risk factor for the following 30-day outcomes: mortality, postoperative major and minor complications, discharge disposition, readmission and reoperation, length of hospital stay (LOS), and operative time. Results No difference in mortality was encountered between SHS and CMN (p = 0.440). Compared to CMN, the SHS cohort had an 11.6% decreased likelihood of a minor complication (p < 0.001); however, no difference was found between CMN and SHS for major complications (p = 0.117). SHS patients were less likely to have transfusion (p < 0.001), DVT (p = 0.007), and MI (0.024). SHS patients were 12.5% more likely to go home (p = 0.002). No association was discovered between being treated with a SHS and reoperation (p = 0.449) and readmission (p = 0.588). SHS patients had almost a quarter of a day longer LOS (p = 0.041). Patients treated with SHS had a statistically significant (p < 0.001), but clinically irrelevant 2-min longer procedure. Level of evidence III.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Proximal Femoral Nail versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation for Trochanteric Fractures: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsThe Scientific World Journal, 2013
- Intramedullary Nails Result in More Reoperations Than Sliding Hip Screws in Two-part Intertrochanteric FracturesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2012
- Dual lag screw cephalomedullary nail versus the classic sliding hip screw for the stabilization of intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective randomized studyStrategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction, 2012
- Comparative prospective study of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture femurJournal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 2012
- Dynamic hip screws versus proximal femoral nails for intertrochanteric fracturesAnz Journal of Surgery, 2011
- Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adultsCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2010
- Gamma Nails Revisited: Gamma Nails Versus Compression Hip Screws in the Management of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Hip: A Meta-AnalysisJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2009
- In Hospital Complications After Total Joint ArthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2008
- Trochanteric Gamma Nail and Compression Hip Screw for Trochanteric FracturesJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2005
- A Randomized Study of the Compression Hip Screw and Gamma Nail in 426 FracturesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2002