Urinary Biomarkers α-GST and π-GST for Evaluation and Monitoring in Living and Deceased Donor Kidney Grafts
Authors:
- Shadi KatouSKShadi Katou
- Brigitta GlobkeBGBrigitta Globke
- M. Haluk MorgulMMM. Haluk Morgul
- Thomas VogelTVThomas Vogel
- Benjamin StrueckerBSBenjamin Struecker
- Natalie Maureen OttoNONatalie Maureen Otto
- Anja Reutzel-SelkeARAnja Reutzel-Selke
- Marion MarksteinerMMMarion Marksteiner
- Jens G. BrockmannJBJens G. Brockmann
- Andreas PascherAPAndreas Pascher
- Volker SchmitzVSVolker Schmitz
Open Access
- 7 November 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 8 (11) , 1899
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the value of urine α- and π-GST in monitoring and predicting kidney graft function following transplantation. In addition, urine samples from corresponding organ donors was analyzed and compared with graft function after organ donation from brain-dead and living donors. Urine samples from brain-dead (n = 30) and living related (n = 50) donors and their corresponding recipients were analyzed before and after kidney transplantation. Urine α- and π-GST values were measured. Kidney recipients were grouped into patients with acute graft rejection (AGR), calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (CNI), and delayed graft function (DGF), and compared to those with unimpaired graft function. Urinary π-GST revealed significant differences in deceased kidney donor recipients with episodes of AGR or DGF at day one after transplantation (p = 0.0023 and p = 0.036, respectively). High π-GST values at postoperative day 1 (cutoff: >21.4 ng/mg urine creatinine (uCrea) or >18.3 ng/mg uCrea for AGR or DGF, respectively) distinguished between rejection and no rejection (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 66.6%) as well as between DGF and normal-functioning grafts (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 62.6%). In living donor recipients, urine levels of α- and π-GST were about 10 times lower than in deceased donor recipients. In deceased donors with impaired graft function in corresponding recipients, urinary α- and π-GST were elevated. α-GST values >33.97 ng/mg uCrea were indicative of AGR with a sensitivity and specificity of 77.7% and 100%, respectively. In deceased donor kidney transplantation, evaluation of urinary α- and π-GST seems to predict different events that deteriorate graft function. To elucidate the potential advantages of such biomarkers, further analysis is warranted.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Delayed Graft Function in the Kidney TransplantAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2011
- Urinary α-GST and π-GST for prediction of dialysis requirement or in-hospital death in established acute kidney injuryBiomarkers, 2011
- A Risk Prediction Model for Delayed Graft Function in the Current Era of Deceased Donor Renal TransplantationAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2010
- Therapeutic Monitoring of Calcineurin Inhibitors for the NephrologistClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2007
- Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations correlate closely to side‐effects in renal transplant recipientsBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1999
- Urinary π-Class Glutathione Transferase as an Indicator of Tubular Damage in the Human KidneyNephron, 1994
- PERCUTANEOUS NEEDLE BIOPSY OF THE RENAL ALLOGRAFTTransplantation, 1990
- Distribution of glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes in human kidney: basis for possible markers of renal injury.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1989
- Glutathione transferase in the urine: A marker for post-transplant tubular lesionsKidney International, 1988
- CYCLOSPORINE PLASMA LEVELS IN RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTSTransplantation, 1985