A Conceptual Framework for Critical Appraisal in Systematic Mixed Studies Reviews
Authors:
- 21 April 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Mixed Methods Research
- Vol. 13 (4) , 446-460
Abstract
The past decade has been rich with methodological advancements in systematic reviews, several of which were inspired by the literature on mixed methods research. Systematic mixed studies reviews—that is, reviews combining qualitative and quantitative evidence—are increasingly popular as they can provide a better understanding of complex phenomena and interventions. However, they raise new challenges, especially regarding how to perform critical appraisal of the included studies that vary regarding the methodologies used. To address this challenge, conceptually clarifying critical appraisal is necessary. To this end, this article provides a framework for critical appraisal in systematic mixed studies reviews. This framework is an essential first step toward providing clear guidance on how to perform critical appraisal.Keywords
Funding Information
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (301011)
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of Cochrane Reviews: a mixed-methods evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the National Institute for Health ResearchHealth Technology Assessment, 2015
- Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: Is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed?Research Synthesis Methods, 2014
- Investigating complexity in systematic reviews of interventions by using a spectrum of methodsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013
- Should We Exclude Inadequately Reported Studies From Qualitative Systematic Reviews? An Evaluation of Sensitivity Analyses in Two Case Study ReviewsQualitative Health Research, 2012
- Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative researchHealth Technology Assessment, 2011
- What do we know about the non-work determinants of workers' mental health? A systematic review of longitudinal studiesBMC Public Health, 2011
- Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical reviewBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2009
- Improving the reporting of public health intervention research: advancing TREND and CONSORTJournal of Public Health, 2008
- Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groupsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2006
- Evaluating non-randomised intervention studiesHealth Technology Assessment, 2003