Mapping municipal land policies: applications of flexible zoning for densification
Open Access
- 15 February 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ubiquity Press, Ltd. in Buildings and Cities
- Vol. 5 (1) , 506-520
Abstract
Municipalities develop individual land policies and can choose not to apply available planning instruments or to apply them differently than intended. While this strategic action can endanger the effectiveness of public policies, it is rarely considered in large-scale analyses. A new geospatial method is presented that captures such strategic action. Empirical evidence from the Canton of Bern, Switzerland, reveals municipalities’ application of planned unit development (PUD), an instrument potentially allowing for flexible zoning negotiations to promote densification. Detailed zoning and building data from the period 2002–23 are used to examine the variation in PUD application by municipalities and whether they apply it to enable densification. Distinguishing by municipality type (i.e. urban core, small town, suburban, rural or touristic) reveals that PUD application is connected to projects with higher building density, more complex parcel changes and, for urban and suburban municipalities, higher density gains in low-density neighbourhoods. However, rural municipalities seldom apply PUD. New indicators of planning complexity provide an insight into whether municipalities apply instruments to enable densification under difficult circumstances. Practice relevance Many policy instruments are provided for in the law, but it is unclear whether and how they are used in practice by municipalities. Following urban densification objectives, municipalities often struggle to implement planning or housing policy instruments, which target private landowners and developers. Therefore, evaluating how different municipalities apply policy instruments and how this application contributes to reaching stated policy goals is crucial. Therefore, this research explores new ways to capture the effect of policy instruments with spatial analysis. Furthermore, by examining the real-world implementation of PUDs, this research sheds light on possible barriers to PUD application for densification, thereby helping policymakers and urban planners improve the effectiveness of public policies.Keywords
Funding Information
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (188939)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ensuring Public Access to Green Spaces in Urban Densification: The Role of Planning and Property RightsPlanning Theory & Practice, 2023
- Vier Thesen zur effektiven Umsetzung der Innenentwicklung in der SchweizdisP - The Planning Review, 2023
- The role of Alpine development regimes in the development of second homes: Preliminary lessons from SwitzerlandLand Use Policy, 2018
- Residential density change: Densification and urban expansionComputers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2015
- Law Activation Strategies (LAS) in Environmental Policymaking: a Social Mechanism for Re‐politicization?European Policy Analysis, 2015
- ‘Many Rivers to Cross’: Suburban Densification and the Social Status Quo in Greater LyonInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2015
- The Politics of Post‐Suburban Densification in Canada and FranceInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2015
- Hard and Soft Densification Policies in the Paris City‐RegionInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2015
- Factors Affecting Planned Unit Development ImplementationPlanning Practice & Research, 2015
- Urban Structures and Land. The Morphological Effects of Dealing with Property RightsHousing Studies, 2011