Does Increasing Farm Plot Size Influence the Visual Quality of Everyday Agricultural Landscapes?
Authors:
- Kristina Janeckova MolnarovaKristina Janeckova Molnarova
- Iris C. BohnetIris C. Bohnet
- Kamila SvobodovaKamila Svobodova
- Kateřina Černý PixováKateřina Černý Pixová
- Michael DanielsMichael Daniels
- Jan SkalošJan Skaloš
- Kristýna DrhlíkováKristýna Drhlíková
- Hossein AzadiHossein Azadi
- Roman ZámečníkRoman Zámečník
- Petr SkleničkaPetr Sklenička
Open Access
- 30 December 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 20 (1) , 687
Abstract
The increase in farm plot size is one of the most apparent and significant trends that have influenced central and eastern European agricultural landscapes since the 1950s. In many countries where the average plot size in traditional land-use systems did not exceed several hectares, present-day plots reach the size of 200 ha or more. In recent times, efforts have been made to reverse this trend to restore important ecosystem functions and to re-establish the aesthetic values of everyday landscapes. Visual landscape quality is becoming a major driving force in the development of agricultural landscapes with known effects on people’s well-being and health, and this quality plays an increasingly important role in agricultural policies. However, no comprehensive research has been carried out to establish the links between perceived visual landscape quality and the scale of the farm plot pattern. The current study was therefore designed to determine whether greater farmland pattern heterogeneity, i.e., smaller farm plot sizes, is consistent with higher visual preferences. The results showed that people preferred a small-scale plot pattern in landscapes characterized by a flat relief and a low proportion of woody vegetation. These homogeneous landscapes were also overall considered significantly less beautiful than more diverse landscapes. However, even a moderate decrease in plot size notably improved these low beauty scores. These preferences were displayed consistently by all respondents, and most strongly by older respondents, respondents with a higher level of education, and those professionally engaged in landscape design or conservation. The high level of consensus among respondents in rejecting further land consolidation in homogeneous landscapes, which form a large proportion of European farmland, underlines that the results of this study provide a valid argument for discussing sustainable agricultural plot sizes as part of agricultural policy-making.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ministerstvo Kultury (DG18P02OVV060)
This publication has 90 references indexed in Scilit:
- Landscape changes and their influence on the heterogeneity of landscape of the South Bohemian Region, the Czech RepublicInternational Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2012
- Exploring public preferences for traditional farming landscapesLandscape and Urban Planning, 2012
- The effects of land uses on soil erosion in Spain: A reviewCATENA, 2010
- The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicatorsEcological Indicators, 2009
- Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest controlProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Assessing the intensity of temperate European agriculture at the landscape scaleEuropean Journal of Agronomy, 2006
- Environmental policy, agri-environmental indicators and landscape indicatorsAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2003
- Windows in the WorkplaceEnvironment and Behavior, 1998
- THE CONCEPTUAL LINKS BETWEEN RECREATION SITE DEVELOPMENT AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS*Journal of Regional Science, 1994
- Development of Visual Preference for Natural EnvironmentsEnvironment and Behavior, 1982