Bilateral mammary artery vs. single mammary artery grafting: promising early results: but will the match finish with enough players?
Open Access
- 18 September 2010
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 31 (20) , 2444-2446
Abstract
This editorial refers to ‘Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART)’†, by D.P. Taggart et al., on page 2470Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART)European Heart Journal, 2010
- Increased Graft Occlusion or String Sign in Composite Arterial Grafting for Mildly Stenosed Target VesselsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2010
- Prevalence and Variability of Internal Mammary Artery Graft Use in Contemporary Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryCirculation, 2009
- Routine Use of Bilateral Skeletonized Internal Thoracic Artery GraftingCirculation, 2008
- Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency Randomized TrialCirculation, 2008
- Use of Both Internal Thoracic Arteries in Diabetic Patients Increases Deep Sternal Wound InfectionThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2007
- Current percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting practices for three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease.☆Insights from the SYNTAX run-in phaseEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2006
- No-touch aorta off-pump coronary surgery: The effect on strokeThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2005
- Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than oneThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1999
- Influence of the Internal-Mammary-Artery Graft on 10-Year Survival and Other Cardiac EventsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986