Clinical Factors Associated With Current Relevance in Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Development of Predictive Models Based on Data From the Spanish Contact Dermatitis Register ( REIDAC )
Authors:
- David PesquéDPDavid Pesqué
- Francisco Javier Ortiz de FrutosFFFrancisco Javier Ortiz de Frutos
- Francisco Navarro‐TriviñoFrancisco Navarro‐Triviño
- Tatiana Sanz‐SánchezTSTatiana Sanz‐Sánchez
- Violeta Zaragoza‐NinetVZVioleta Zaragoza‐Ninet
- Susana Córdoba‐GuijarroSCSusana Córdoba‐Guijarro
- Javier Miquel‐MiquelJMJavier Miquel‐Miquel
- Juan Francisco Silvestre‐SalvadorJSJuan Francisco Silvestre‐Salvador
- Inmaculada Ruiz‐GonzálezIRInmaculada Ruiz‐González
- Pedro Mercader‐GarcíaPMPedro Mercader‐García
Open Access
- 19 February 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Contact Dermatitis
- Vol. 94 (6) , 614-623
Abstract
Background: Current relevance of positive patch‐test reactions guides management in allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), yet its clinical predictors and the use of predictive models in clinical practice remain underused. Objectives: To identify demographic and clinical factors associated with current relevance in ACD and to develop overall and allergen‐specific predictive models. Methods: A multicentric REIDAC study included data from patch‐tested patients with the Spanish baseline series. Exposure history, anatomical sites, atopic status, and occupational data were recorded. Logistic regression (LR) models were trained and internally validated to predict current relevance overall and for top frequent allergens. Model discrimination was assessed with area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Among 17 005 patients, 4077 (24.0%) had at least one currently relevant reaction. The final overall LR model achieved an AUC for the validation sample of 0.679. Allergen‐specific AUC parameters (LR) varied among allergens but performed best for nickel (AUC = 0.770). The independent factors associated with current relevance were female gender, specific body sites (hand, neck, head, leg, feet) and two occupations (hairdresser and construction workers). The use of other models (LASSO, gradient boosting) revealed similar results. Conclusions: Prediction modelling may moderately predict current relevance in ACD and several clinical variables are associated with current relevance in ACD.Keywords
Funding Information
- Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios
- Sanofi
- LEO Pharma
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Occupational Contact Dermatitis in Construction Workers: A Retrospective Analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2001–2020Dermatitis®, 2024
- Actualización de la batería estándar y batería ampliada de pruebas alérgicas de contacto por el Grupo Español de Investigación en Dermatitis de Contacto y Alergia Cutánea (GEIDAC)Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas, 2024
- Diagnostics and Prevention of Occupational Allergy in HairdressersCurrent Allergy and Asthma Reports, 2023
- North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2019–2020Dermatitis®, 2023
- Novel insights into contact dermatitisJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2022
- Alérgenos candidatos para ser incluidos en la serie estándar española a partir de los datos del Registro Español de Dermatitis de ContactoActas Dermo-Sifiliograficas, 2021
- Allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics: retrospective analysis of a population subjected to patch tests between 2004 and 2017Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 2020
- ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 1. ROC plots showed no added value above the AUC when evaluating the performance of clinical prediction modelsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2020
- Modelo predictivo de dermatitis alérgica de contacto en pacientes con eccema de manosActas Dermo-Sifiliograficas, 2020
- Risk factors of polysensitization to contact allergensBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2013