Some Animals are More Equal Than Others
Authors:
- 1 July 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy
- Vol. 53 (206) , 507-527
Abstract
It is a welcome development when academic philosophy starts to concern itself with practical issues, in such a way as to influence people's lives. Recently this has happened with one moral issue in particular—but infortunately it is the wrong issue, and people's actions have been influenced in the wrong way. The issue is that of the moral status and treatment of animals. A number of philosophers have argued for what they call ‘animal liberation’, comparing it directly with egalitarian causes such as women's liberation and racial equality and suggesting that, if racism and sexism are rationally indefensible, so is ‘speciesism’. If one ought to give equal consideration to the interests of all human beings, then, so they daim, one must on the same grounds and in the same way recognize that ‘all animals are equal’, be they human or non-human. We believe that this assimilation of ‘animal liberation’ to human liberation movements is mistaken.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- SociobiologyThe Journal of Zoo Animal Medicine, 1980
- Active and Passive EuthanasiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975
- To Save or Let DieJAMA, 1974
- Moral and Ethical Dilemmas in the Special-Care NurseryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1973
- Dilemmas of “Informed Consent” in ChildrenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1973
- Mongolism, Parental Desires, and the Right to LifePerspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1973
- Animal Liberation1973
- Spina Bifida Cystica: Results of Treatment of 270 Consecutive Cases with Criteria for Selection for the FutureArchives of Disease in Childhood, 1972
- Class, Codes and ControlBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 1972
- Choosing Not to Prolong Dying1972