Advanced cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: updating a clinical prediction model – a large database study protocol
Authors:
Open Access
- 7 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
- Vol. 5 (1) , 1-7
Abstract
Background: Patients presenting with chest pain represent a large proportion of attendances to emergency departments. In these patients clinicians often consider the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the timely recognition and treatment of which is clinically important. Clinical prediction models (CPMs) have been used to enhance early diagnosis of AMI. The Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid is currently in clinical use across Greater Manchester. CPMs have been shown to deteriorate over time through calibration drift. We aim to assess potential calibration drift with T-MACS and compare methods for updating the model. Methods: We will use routinely collected electronic data from patients who were treated using TMACS at two large NHS hospitals. This is estimated to include approximately 14,000 patient episodes spanning June 2016 to October 2020. The primary outcome of acute myocardial infarction will be sourced from NHS Digital’s admitted patient care dataset. We will assess the calibration drift of the existing model and the benefit of updating the CPM by model recalibration, model extension and dynamic updating. These models will be validated by bootstrapping and one step ahead prequential testing. We will evaluate predictive performance using calibrations plots and c-statistics. We will also examine the reclassification of predicted probability with the updated TMACS model. Discussion: CPMs are widely used in modern medicine, but are vulnerable to deteriorating calibration over time. Ongoing refinement using routinely collected electronic data will inevitably be more efficient than deriving and validating new models. In this analysis we will seek to exemplify methods for updating CPMs to protect the initial investment of time and effort. If successful, the updating methods could be used to continually refine the algorithm used within TMACS, maintaining or even improving predictive performance over time. Trial registration: ISRCTN number: ISRCTN41008456Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR300246)
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevationEuropean Heart Journal, 2015
- Improving patient prostate cancer risk assessment: Moving from static, globally-applied to dynamic, practice-specific risk calculatorsJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2015
- Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and ElaborationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2015
- Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical researchJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2013
- Dynamic Logistic Regression and Dynamic Model Averaging for Binary ClassificationBiometrics, 2011
- Online Prediction Under Model Uncertainty via Dynamic Model Averaging: Application to a Cold Rolling MillTechnometrics, 2010
- Ten steps towards improving prognosis researchBMJ, 2009
- Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: a study on sample size and shrinkageStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Missed Diagnoses of Acute Cardiac Ischemia in the Emergency DepartmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuriesAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1992