Computer Implementation of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury for Consistent and Efficient Derivation of Its Subscores Including Handling of Data from Not Testable Segments
Authors:
- Christian SchuldCSChristian Schuld
- Hubertus J.A. van HedelHHHubertus J.A. van Hedel
- Norbert Weidner, EM-SCI Study GroupNGNorbert Weidner, EM-SCI Study Group
- 10 February 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Neurotrauma
- Vol. 29 (3) , 453-461
Abstract
The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI), defined by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), and particularly the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) are widely used for research and clinical purposes. Although detailed procedures for scaling, scoring, and classification have been defined, misclassifications remain a major problem, especially for cases with missing (i.e., not testable [NT]) data. This work aimed to implement computer-based classification algorithms that included rules for handling NT data. A consistent and structured algorithmic scoring, scaling, and classification scheme, and a computerized application have been developed by redefining logical/mathematical imprecisions. Existing scoring rules are extended for handling NT segments. Design criterion is a pure logical approach so that substitution of non-testability for all valid examination scores leads to concordant results. Nine percent of 5542 datasets from 1594 patients in the database of the European Multicenter Study of Human Spinal Cord Injury (EM-SCI) contained NT segments. After adjusting computational algorithms, the classification accuracy was equivalent between clinical experts and the computational approach and resulted in 84% valid AIS classifications within datasets containing NT. Additionally, the computational method is much more efficient, processing approximately 200,000 classifications/sec. Computational algorithms offer the ability to classify ISNCSCI subscores efficiently and without the risk of human-induced errors. This is of particular clinical relevance, since these scores are used for early predictions of neurological recovery and functional outcome for patients with spinal cord injuries.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of Impairment in Patients with Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of the LiteratureJournal of Neurotrauma, 2011
- Outcome measures: evolution in clinical trials of neurological/functional recovery in spinal cord injurySpinal Cord, 2010
- A web-based computer program to determine the ASIA impairment classificationSpinal Cord, 2009
- Computerized Classification of Neurologic Injury Based on the International Standards for Classification of Spinal Cord InjuryThe Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2009
- International Standards For Neurological Classification Of Spinal Cord Injury: Training Effect On Accurate ClassificationThe Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2008
- Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trialsSpinal Cord, 2006
- Providing the clinical basis for new interventional therapies: refined diagnosis and assessment of recovery after spinal cord injurySpinal Cord, 2004
- International Standards For Neurological Classification Of Spinal Cord InjuryThe Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2003
- Finding code on the World Wide Web: a preliminary investigation2002
- A test of the 1992 International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord InjurySpinal Cord, 1998