Artificial intelligence electrocardiography for left ventricular systolic dysfunction demonstrates preserved performance across demographic training imbalances
Open Access
- 18 May 2026
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal - Digital Health
- Vol. 7 (5) , ztag080
Abstract
Aims: Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled electrocardiograms (AI-ECG) can detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), but demographic imbalance in training datasets may introduce bias. Foundational models, pretrained on large and diverse datasets, may mitigate such concerns. We aimed to assess the impact of demographic composition in training datasets on the performance of an ECG Foundational Model (ECGFM) for diagnosing LVSD. Methods and results: We developed an ECG foundational model (ECGFM) using transformer architecture and self-supervised pretraining on 983 200 ECGs. Using 44 815 paired ECG–echocardiogram datasets, we trained the model under three biased scenarios: (1) sex-skewed (male-only or female-only), (2) race-skewed (White-only or non-White), and (3) balanced. Models were evaluated on a test cohort consisting of 4663 male patients (52%) and 4300 female patients (48%) for the sex configuration and 4440 (49.5%) White, 558 (6.2%) Black, 925 Asian (10.3%), and 3040 other (33.9%) patients, for the race-based configuration using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The ECGFM demonstrated consistent performance across all demographic configurations. Training on male-only or female-only cohorts yielded comparable AUROC scores of 0.85–0.90 for both sexes in the test set in predicting LVSD. Similarly, training on White-only or non-White cohorts resulted in robust AUROC scores (≥0.90) across all racial groups, including Asian, Black, Hispanic/Latino, and American Indian/Native Alaskan subgroups. Balanced and imbalanced training produced comparable accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The performance of the model was externally tested in EchoNext, revealing AUROC scores 0.823–0.917 for sex and 0.822–0.917 for race. Conclusion: Our transformer-based ECG foundational model pretrained using self-supervised learning demonstrated preserved diagnostic accuracy for LVSD across diverse demographic groups, even when trained on demographically imbalanced datasets.Keywords
Funding Information
- Grant-in-Aid (#15GRNT23070001)
- Institute of Precision Medicine (17UNPG33840017)
- American Heart Association
- National Institutes of Health (1 R01 HL135335–01)
- National Institutes of Health (1 R21 HL137870–01)
- National Institutes of Health (1 R21EB026164–01)
- National Institutes of Health (3R21EB026164–02S1)
- National Institutes of Health (1R01HL173935–01)
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hidden in Plain Sight — Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical AlgorithmsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Gender imbalance in medical imaging datasets produces biased classifiers for computer-aided diagnosisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020
- Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populationsScience, 2019
- Population and fertility by age and sex for 195 countries and territories, 1950–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017The Lancet, 2018
- Economic Burden of Heart Failure: Investigating Outpatient and Inpatient Costs in Abeokuta, Southwest NigeriaPLOS ONE, 2014
- The annual global economic burden of heart failureInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2014
- Comparison of Characteristics and Outcomes of Asymptomatic Versus Symptomatic Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Subjects 65 Years Old or Older (from the Cardiovascular Health Study)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2011
- Diagnostic ability of B-type natriuretic peptide and impedance cardiography: Testing to identify left ventricular dysfunction in hypertensive patientsAmerican Journal of Hypertension, 2005
- Natural History of Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in the CommunityCirculation, 2003
- PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNetCirculation, 2000