Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial
Authors:
- Samuel G. SmithSSSamuel G. Smith
- Wendy AtkinWAWendy Atkin
- Rosalind RaineRRRosalind Raine
- Lesley M. McGregorLMLesley M. McGregor
- Gemma VartGVGemma Vart
- Steve MorrisSMSteve Morris
- Stephen W. DuffySDStephen W. Duffy
- Susan MossSMSusan Moss
- Allan HackshawAHAllan Hackshaw
- Stephen HalloranSHStephen Halloran
- Ines Kralj-HansIKInes Kralj-Hans
Open Access
- 14 August 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Cancer
- Vol. 17 (1) , 1-9
Abstract
Uptake of colorectal cancer screening is low in the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP). Participation in screening is strongly associated with socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to determine whether a supplementary leaflet providing the ‘gist’ of guaiac-based Faecal Occult Blood test (gFOBt) screening for colorectal cancer could reduce the socioeconomic status (SES) gradient in uptake in the English NHS BCSP. The trial was integrated within routine BCSP operations in November 2012. Using a cluster randomised controlled design all adults aged 59–74 years who were being routinely invited to complete the gFOBt were randomised based on day of invitation. The Index of Multiple Deprivation was used to create SES quintiles. The control group received the standard information booklet (‘SI’). The intervention group received the SI booklet and the Gist leaflet (‘SI + Gist’) which had been designed to help people with lower literacy engage with the invitation. Blinding of hubs was not possible and invited subjects were not made aware of a comparator condition. The primary outcome was the gradient in uptake across IMD quintiles. In November 2012, 163,525 individuals were allocated to either the ‘SI’ intervention (n = 79,104) or the ‘SI + Gist’ group (n = 84,421). Overall uptake was similar between the intervention and control groups (SI: 57.3% and SI + Gist: 57.6%; OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92–1.13, p = 0.77). Uptake was 42.0% (SI) vs. 43.0% (SI + Gist) in the most deprived quintile and 65.6% vs. 65.8% in the least deprived quintile (interaction p = 0.48). The SES gradient in uptake was similar between the study groups within age, gender, hub and screening round sub-groups. Providing supplementary simplified information in addition to the standard information booklet did not reduce the SES gradient in uptake in the NHS BCSP. The effectiveness of the Gist leaflet when used alone should be explored in future research. ISRCTN74121020 , registered: 17/20/2012.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute for Health Research (RP-PG- 0609-10106)
- Cancer Research UK (C42785/A17965)
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think‐aloud studyHealth Expectations, 2013
- Risk perception and communication in vaccination decisions: A fuzzy-trace theory approachVaccine, 2012
- Strategy for power calculation for interactions: Application to a trial of interventions to improve uptake of bowel cancer screeningContemporary Clinical Trials, 2012
- Primary care endorsement letter and a patient leaflet to improve participation in colorectal cancer screening: results of a factorial randomised trialBritish Journal of Cancer, 2011
- Patient navigation: An update on the state of the scienceCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2011
- Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in EnglandInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- A Demonstration of ‘‘Less Can Be More’’ in Risk GraphicsMedical Decision Making, 2010
- Health literacy and self-efficacy for participating in colorectal cancer screening: The role of information processingPatient Education and Counseling, 2009
- A Theory of Medical Decision Making and Health: Fuzzy Trace TheoryMedical Decision Making, 2008
- Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic modelHealth Expectations, 2008