Development of a Performance Measurement Framework for European Health Technology Assessment: Stakeholder-Centric Key Performance Indicators Identified in a Delphi Approach by the European Access Academy
Authors:
- Elaine JulianEJElaine Julian
- Nicolas S. H. XanderNXNicolas S. H. Xander
- Konstantina BoumakiKBKonstantina Boumaki
- Maria João GarciaMGMaria João Garcia
- Evelina JahimovicaEJEvelina Jahimovica
- Joséphine Mosset-KeaneJMJoséphine Mosset-Keane
- Monica Hildegard OttoMOMonica Hildegard Otto
- Mira PavlovicMPMira Pavlovic
- Giovanna ScroccaroGSGiovanna Scroccaro
- Valentina StrammielloVSValentina Strammiello
- Renato BernardiniRenato Bernardini
- Stefano CapriSCStefano Capri
Open Access
- 15 January 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Market Access & Health Policy
- Vol. 14 (1) , 5
Abstract
Background: The objective of this work was to support the implementation of the European Health Technology Assessment Regulation (EU HTAR) and optimize performance of the evolving EU HTA system. Therefore, an inclusive multi-stakeholder framework of key performance indicators (KPI) for success measurement was developed. Methods: A modified Delphi-procedure was applied as follows: (1) development of a generic KPI pool at the Fall Convention 2024 of the European Access Academy (EAA); (2) review of initial pool and identification of additional KPIs; (3) development of prioritized KPIs covering patient, clinician, Health Technology Developer (HTD), and System/Member State (MS) perspectives, and (4) consolidation of the stakeholder-centric KPIs after EAA’s Spring Convention 2025. Results: Steps 1 and 2 of the Delphi procedure revealed 14 generic KPI domains. Steps 3 and 4 resulted in four prioritized KPIs for patients (patient input; utilization of patient-centric outcome measures; time to access; equity); six for clinicians (population/intervention/comparator/outcomes (PICO); addressing uncertainty; clinician involvement; transparency; equity and time to access); four for HTDs (PICO; joint scientific consultation (JSC) process; joint clinical assessment (JCA) process; time to national decision making); five from a system/MS perspective (PICO; learning and training the health system; reducing duplication; equity and time to access). The scope of, e.g., the PICO-related KPI, differed between stakeholder groups. Also, several KPIs intentionally reached beyond the remit of EU HTA as they are also dependent on MS-specific factors including national health systems and budgets. Discussion and Conclusions: The KPI framework developed here presents a step towards the generation of systematic multi-stakeholder evidence to support a successful implementation of the EU HTAR. The relevance of the identified stakeholder-centric KPIs is confirmed by their alignment with the Health System Goals suggested in the context of “Performance measurement for health improvement” by the World Health Organisation. Implementation of the framework, i.e., measurement of KPIs, is envisioned to provide evidence to inform the 2028 revision of the EU HTAR.Keywords
Funding Information
- AbbVie
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Advancing cooperation in Health Technology Assessment in Europe: insights from the EUnetHTA 21 project amidst the evolving legal landscape of European HTAInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2024
- Perspectives on how to build bridges between regulation, health technology assessment and clinical guideline development: a qualitative focus group study with European expertsBMJ Open, 2023
- Involvement of Patients and Medical Professionals in the Assessment of Relative Effectiveness: A Need for Closer CooperationValue in Health, 2022
- The ecosystem of health decision making: from fragmentation to synergyThe Lancet Public Health, 2022
- Impact of the European Union on access to medicines in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping reviewThe Lancet Regional Health - Europe, 2021
- What factors affect patients’ ability to access healthcare? An overview of systematic reviewsTropical Medicine & International Health, 2021
- Access to medicines - a systematic review of the literatureResearch in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 2020
- Performance-based financing as a health system reform: mapping the key dimensions for monitoring and evaluationBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- Health Technology AssessmentMedical Decision Making, 2011
- A history of health technology assessment at the European levelInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2009