New, but Not Improved? Incorporating Comparative-Effectiveness Information into FDA Labeling
Authors:
- Randall S. StaffordRandall S. Stafford
- Todd H. WagnerTodd H. Wagner
- Philip W. LavoriPLPhilip W. Lavori
- 24 September 2009
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 361 (13) , 1230-1233
Abstract
New technologies, including prescription drugs and medical devices, are a major driver of increases in U.S. health care expenditures, which have grown by an estimated 71% since 2000.1 The U.S. market for drugs and devices is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which scrutinizes clinical trial data for evidence of safety and efficacy. Although the FDA has been criticized for missteps and inefficiencies in its approval process, these are not the causes of increasing health care expenditures. More relevant is FDA oversight of the labeling and promotion of medical products.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The FDA as a Public Health AgencyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2009
- Health Spending Projections Through 2018: Recession Effects Add Uncertainty To The OutlookHealth Affairs, 2009
- Narrative Review: The U.S. Pharmacopeia and Model Guidelines for Medicare Part D FormulariesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2006