Present-Day Hospital Readmissions after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Large Single-Center Study
Authors:
- Ruben E. HernandezRHRuben E. Hernandez
- Steve K. SinghSSSteve K. Singh
- Dale T. HoangDHDale T. Hoang
- Syed W. AliSASyed W. Ali
- MacArthur A. ElaydaMEMacArthur A. Elayda
- Hari R. MallidiHMHari R. Mallidi
- O.H. FrazierOFO.H. Frazier
- Deborah E. MeyersDMDeborah E. Meyers
- 1 October 2015
- journal article
- Published by Texas Heart Institute Journal in Texas Heart Institute Journal
- Vol. 42 (5) , 419-429
Abstract
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy improves survival, hemodynamic status, and end-organ perfusion in patients with refractory advanced heart failure. Hospital readmission is an important measure of the intensity of LVAD support care. We analyzed readmissions of 148 patients (mean age, 53.6 ± 12.7 yr; 83% male) who received a HeartMate II LVAD from April 2008 through June 2012. The patients had severe heart failure; 60.1% were in Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support class 1 or 2. All patients were observed for at least 12 months, and readmissions were classified as planned or unplanned. Descriptive and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify predictors of unplanned readmission. Twenty-seven patients (18.2%) had no readmissions or 69 planned readmissions, and 121 patients (81.8%) had 460 unplanned readmissions. The LVAD-related readmissions were for bleeding, thrombosis, and anticoagulation (n=103; 49.1%), pump-related infections (n=60; 28.6%), and neurologic events (n=28; 13.3%). The readmission rate was 2.1 per patient-year. Unplanned readmissions were for comorbidities and underlying cardiac disease (54.3%) or LVAD-related causes (45.7%). In the unplanned-readmission rate, there was no significant difference between bridge-to-transplantation and destination-therapy patients. Unplanned readmissions were associated with diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR]=3.3; P=0.04) and with shorter mileage from residence to hospital (OR=0.998; P=0.046). Unplanned admissions for LVAD-related sequelae and ongoing comorbidities were common. Diabetes mellitus and shorter distance from residence to hospital were significant predictors of readmission. We project that improved management of comorbidities and of anticoagulation therapy will reduce unplanned readmissions of LVAD patients in the future.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Device Related Infections: Are We Making Progress?Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 2010
- Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Improves Functional Capacity and Quality of Life of Advanced Heart Failure PatientsJACC, 2010
- Clinical management of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices in advanced heart failureThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2010
- Glycosylated hemoglobin levels and outcome in non-diabetic cardiac surgery patientsCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2010
- Contemporary Use of Ventricular Assist DevicesAnnual Review of Medicine, 2010
- Renal and Hepatic Function Improve in Advanced Heart Failure Patients During Continuous-Flow Support With the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist DeviceCirculation, 2009
- Advanced Heart Failure Treated with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist DeviceNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Improved survival after coronary artery bypass grafting has not influenced the mortality disadvantage in patients with diabetes mellitusThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2009
- Patterns of Hospital Performance in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure 30-Day Mortality and ReadmissionCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2009
- Extended Mechanical Circulatory Support With a Continuous-Flow Rotary Left Ventricular Assist DeviceJACC, 2009