Structured Clinical Decision Aids Are Seldom Compared With Subjective Physician Judgment, and Are Seldom Superior
- 1 September 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 70 (3) , 338-344.e3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methodologic Standards for Interpreting Clinical Decision Rules in Emergency Medicine: 2014 UpdateAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2014
- Lessons From the Glasgow Coma ScaleAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2012
- Medical Decisionmaking: Let's Not Forget the PhysicianAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2012
- Some Thoughts on the Stability of Decision RulesAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2007
- The intrinsic fallibility of clinical judgmentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2003
- Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis.Psychological Assessment, 2000
- Methodologic Standards for the Development of Clinical Decision Rules in Emergency MedicineAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1999
- Use of a Clinical Model for Safe Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary EmbolismAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validationJAMA, 1993
- Clinical Prediction RulesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985