Responses to refusals of requests: Face threat and persistence, persuasion and forgiving statements
Authors:
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Quarterly
- Vol. 52 (4) , 347-356
Abstract
Wilson et al.'s (1998) revision of politeness theory has been applied to requesting, refusing and relational development, finding that different types of face threat are present in an interaction depending on the interaction goals. This investigation seeks to extend Wilson et al.'s (1998) work by determining how threats to a speaker's and hearer's face needs influence a requester's desire to persist and use of persuasion and forgiving statements after refusal. Results indicate that refusals creating greater threat to the positive and negative face needs of requesters yield greater desire to persist and use of persuasion statements. Specific face threats did not appear to be related to use of forgiving statements.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identity Implications of Influence GoalsJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 2000
- Identity Implications of Influence Goals A Revised Analysis of Face-Threatening Acts and Application to Seeking Compliance With Same-Sex FriendsHuman Communication Research, 1998
- Understanding Obstacles Preventing ComplianceCommunication Research, 1998
- Preserving Face in Refusal SituationsCommunication Research, 1998
- Responding to Rejected RequestsJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 1996
- Acquiring Resources from Intimates When Obligation Substitutes for PersuasionHuman Communication Research, 1988
- Presequences and indirectionJournal of Pragmatics, 1988
- THE DISCOURSE OF REQUESTS.Human Communication Research, 1986
- A TRANSACTIONAL ANALYSIS OF COMPLIANCE-GAINING BEHAVIOR.Human Communication Research, 1985
- AN INVESTIGATION OF COMPLIANCE-GAINING AS POLITENESSHuman Communication Research, 1984