The information battle between algorithmic trading and ESG fund investors
Authors:
- 11 June 2026
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Economics Letters
- p. 1-5
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- National Social Science Fund of China (23AJY020])
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Information acquisition costs and price informativeness: global evidenceReview of Accounting Studies, 2025
- Green investors and ESG ratings divergenceScientific Reports, 2025
- Do Analysts Care About ESG Performance? Evidence From Tracking DecisionsInternational Journal of Finance & Economics, 2025
- Green investors and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from ChinaFinance Research Letters, 2023
- Do Foreign Institutional Investors Improve Price Efficiency?The Review of Financial Studies, 2020
- Does Algorithmic Trading Reduce Information Acquisition?The Review of Financial Studies, 2017
- High-Frequency Trading and Price DiscoveryThe Review of Financial Studies, 2014
- High‐Frequency Trading and the Execution Costs of Institutional InvestorsFinancial Review, 2014
- Does Algorithmic Trading Improve Liquidity?The Journal of Finance, 2011
- Valuation waves and merger activity: The empirical evidenceJournal of Financial Economics, 2005