Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in fetuses with multisystem malformations: systematic review and meta‐analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 18 January 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 59 (6) , 715-722
Abstract
Objective To determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) above chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or karyotype in fetuses with multiple multisystem structural anomalies (at least two major anomalies from different anatomical systems). Method This is a systematic review conducted in accordance with PRISMA criteria. All studies identified in PubMed, Ovid Medline and Web of Science, describing ES, whole genome and next-generation sequencing in fetuses with multisystem malformation. Selected studies included those with: a) five cases or more; b) only fetuses with at least two major anomalies from different anatomical systems; and c) only positive variants classified as IV or V (likely pathogenic or pathogenic) determined to be causative of the fetal phenotype were considered. A negative CMA or karyotype result was treated as the reference standard. Incidence was used as the pooled effect size by single-proportion analysis using random-effects modeling (weighted by inverse of variance), along with the Clopper–Pearson exact method for calculation of confidence intervals. The solo (the fetus alone was sequenced) was compared with the trio approach (the fetus and both parents were sequenced). Results Seventeen articles with data on ES diagnostic yield including 694 individuals with multisystem malformation were identified. Overall, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was found in 213 fetuses, resulting in a 33%; (95%CI: 27% to 40%) incremental performance pool of ES. A stratified analysis showed similar diagnostic yields of ES using the solo approach {33% (95%CI: 27 to 40)} as compared to the trio approach {34% (95%CI: 27 to 42)}. Conclusion ES applied in fetuses with multiple multisystem structural anomalies is able to find the causative gene in a third of the cases. No differences were observed between the solo and trio approach for ES.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular PathologyGenetics in Medicine, 2015
- Exome sequencing improves genetic diagnosis of structural fetal abnormalities revealed by ultrasoundHuman Molecular Genetics, 2014
- The clinical utility of microarray technologies applied to prenatal cytogenetics in the presence of a normal conventional karyotype: a review of the literaturePrenatal Diagnosis, 2013
- Points to consider in the clinical application of genomic sequencingGenetics in Medicine, 2012
- The Prevalence of Congenital Anomalies in Europe2010
- Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analysesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Fixed‐Effect Versus Random‐Effects Models2009
- Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysisBiostatistics, 2000
- Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphicalBMJ, 1998
- Ultrasonographically detectable markers of fetal chromosomal abnormalitiesThe Lancet, 1992