Computer Security Incident Response Team Effectiveness: A Needs Assessment
Open Access
- 12 December 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Psychology
- Vol. 8, 2179
Abstract
Computer security incident response teams (CSIRTs) respond to a computer security incident when the need arises. Failure of these teams can have far-reaching effects for the economy and national security. CSIRTs often have to work on an ad hoc basis, in close cooperation with other teams, and in time constrained environments. It could be argued that under these working conditions CSIRTs would be likely to encounter problems. A needs assessment was done to see to which extent this argument holds true. We constructed an incident response needs model to assist in identifying areas that require improvement. We envisioned a model consisting of four assessment categories: Organization, Team, Individual and Instrumental. Central to this is the idea that both problems and needs can have an organizational, team, individual, or technical origin or a combination of these levels. To gather data we conducted a literature review. This resulted in a comprehensive list of challenges and needs that could hinder or improve, respectively, the performance of CSIRTs. Then, semi-structured in depth interviews were held with team coordinators and team members of five public and private sector Dutch CSIRTs to ground these findings in practice and to identify gaps between current and desired incident handling practices. This paper presents the findings of our needs assessment and ends with a discussion of potential solutions to problems with performance in incident response.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Information security incident management: Current practice as reported in the literatureComputers & Security, 2014
- Supporting collaborative sense-making in emergency management through geo-visualizationInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2013
- Incident response teams – Challenges in supporting the organisational security functionComputers & Security, 2012
- Conducting research interviewsManagement Research Review, 2012
- Team sensemakingTheoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2010
- How Conversations Change Over Time in Face-to-Face and Video-Mediated CommunicationSmall Group Research, 2009
- Making Sense of Sensemaking 1: Alternative PerspectivesIEEE Intelligent Systems, 2006
- Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork?Small Group Research, 2005
- Needs assessment—a digest, review, and comparison of needs assessment literaturePerformance Improvement Journal, 1998
- Groups in Context: A Model of Task Group EffectivenessAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1984