Cost-Effectiveness of 20-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Argentinean Adults
Open Access
- 3 May 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Infectious Diseases and Therapy
- Vol. 13 (6) , 1235-1251
Abstract
Introduction In Argentina, vaccination with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) followed by 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23; PCV13 → PPSV23) has been recommended for all adults aged ≥ 65 years and younger adults with chronic medical (“moderate-risk”) or immunocompromising (“high-risk”) conditions since 2017. With the approval of a 20-valent PCV (PCV20), we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of PCV20 versus current recommendations for moderate-/high-risk adults aged 18–64 years and all adults 65–99 years. Methods A probabilistic cohort model was used to project lifetime outcomes and costs associated with invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and all-cause non-bacteremic pneumonia (NBP), and the expected impact of vaccination. Clinical outcomes were projected annually based on Argentinean data. Economic costs were estimated based on cases and corresponding medical costs (adjusted to 2023 USD) and costs of vaccine and administration. Cost-effectiveness of PCV20 was evaluated versus the current strategy, PCV13 → PPSV23, and alternatively, versus sequentially administered 15-valent PCV and PPSV23 (PCV15 → PPSV23), and presented as cost per quality-adjusted life year gained; a healthcare system perspective was used. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3%/year. Results PCV20 in lieu of PCV13 → PPSV23 among moderate-/high-risk adults aged 18–64 years and all adults 65–99 years (N = 13.4M) prevented 3838 IPD, 4377 inpatient NBP, and 6003 outpatient NBP cases, and 1865 disease-related deaths; relative to PCV15 → PPSV23 the corresponding reductions were 2775, 3285, 4518, and 1348. PCV20 was projected to be the dominant strategy versus PCV13 → PPSV23 and PCV15 → PPSV23 as overall costs were lower by $87.6M and $80.8M, respectively. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, PCV20 was dominant (i.e., more effective, less costly) in 100% of 1000 simulations. Conclusions Analyses suggest implementing a PCV20 vaccination program in moderate-/high-risk adults aged 18–64 years and all adults ≥ 65 years—in lieu of PCV13 → PPSV23—would yield substantial reductions in pneumococcal disease and would be cost saving to the Argentinean healthcare system.Keywords
Funding Information
- Pfizer
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of 23-Valent Polysaccharide Pneumococcal Vaccine and Changes in Invasive Pneumococcal Disease Incidence from 2000 to 2017 in Those Aged 65 and Over in England and WaleseClinicalMedicine, 2018
- Incremental Cost-Effectiveness of 13-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine for Adults Age 50 Years and Older in the United StatesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2016
- Cross-Country Analysis of EQ-5D Data2013
- Morbidity and mortality of pneumonia in adults in six Latin American countriesInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2013
- Modeling of Cost Effectiveness of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccination Strategies in U.S. Older AdultsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2013
- Vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in adultsCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013
- The effect of underlying clinical conditions on the risk of developing invasive pneumococcal disease in EnglandJournal of Infection, 2012
- Using Health State Utility Values from the General Population to Approximate Baselines in Decision Analytic Models when Condition-Specific Data are Not AvailableValue in Health, 2011
- Effect of Pneumococcal Vaccination in Hospitalized Adults With Community-Acquired PneumoniaArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2007
- Cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination for prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease in the elderly: an update for 10 Western European countriesEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2007