Donor age as a dual‐risk factor for donor safety and recipient survival in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Authors:
- Satoshi NishiwakiSNSatoshi Nishiwaki
- Yoshiko AtsutaYAYoshiko Atsuta
- Ryu YanagisawaRYRyu Yanagisawa
- Hideki NakasoneHNHideki Nakasone
- Takashi NagayamaTNTakashi Nagayama
- Fumiya WadaFWFumiya Wada
- Naoyuki UchidaNUNaoyuki Uchida
- Noriko DokiNDNoriko Doki
- Takahiro FukudaTFTakahiro Fukuda
- Masatsugu TanakaMTMasatsugu Tanaka
- Yuta HasegawaYHYuta Hasegawa
- 26 July 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Haematology
- Vol. 209 (4) , 1797-1806
Abstract
Summary: Donor selection in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) requires balancing donor safety and recipient survival. We aimed to identify dual—association donor factors (DADFs)—donor characteristics associated with both increased serious adverse events (SAEs) and inferior patient survival—using umbilical cord blood (UCB) as a donor‐safety benchmark. This nationwide retrospective cohort study analysed Japanese registry data (2013–2022) including 22 892 donors and 29 559 recipients. Logistic regression identified donor SAE risk factors, while patient outcomes were evaluated using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)‐adjusted Cox models with UCB as reference. Propensity score matching (PSM) compared UCB with older donor haploidentical transplantation using post‐transplant cyclophosphamide (OD‐PTCy‐Haplo). Among donors, 93 (0.41%) experienced an SAE. Older donor age and female sex were independent risk factors for SAE. In IPTW‐adjusted analyses, allo‐HSCT from older haploidentical donors was associated with inferior overall survival (OS) and relapse‐free survival (RFS) compared with UCB. In PSM analyses of elderly high‐risk recipients, OD‐PTCy‐Haplo resulted in significantly worse OS and RFS than UCB. Older donor age emerged as a donor characteristic associated with increased donor SAE risk and inferior patient survival, particularly in haploidentical transplantation. UCB may offer a more favourable balance between donor safety and patient outcomes in selected high‐risk settings.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Donor Selection: Contemporary Guidelines from the NMDP/CIBMTRTransplantation and Cellular Therapy, 2025
- Allogeneic Stem Cell DonationJAMA, 2025
- Haploidentical Versus Mismatched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: HLA Factors and Donor Age ConsiderationsTransplantation and Cellular Therapy, 2024
- Impact of Donor Age in Haploidentical-Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide versus Matched Unrelated Donor Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid LeukemiaTransplantation and Cellular Therapy, 2023
- Severe short-term adverse events in related bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell donorsInternational Journal of Hematology, 2022
- Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Versus Tacrolimus and Methotrexate Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis for HLA-Matched Donor TransplantationTransplantation and Cellular Therapy, 2022
- Haploidentical versus Matched Unrelated versus Matched Sibling Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation CyclophosphamideTransplantation and Cellular Therapy, 2022
- Donor Selection for Adults and Pediatrics2018
- Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studiesStatistics in Medicine, 2015
- Adjusted survival curves with inverse probability weightsComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2004