An evaluation of benthic community structure in and around the Sackville Spur closed area (Northwest Atlantic) in relation to the protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems
Open Access
- 1 January 2012
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in ICES Journal of Marine Science
- Vol. 69 (2) , 213-222
Abstract
Barrio Froján, C. R. S., MacIsaac, K. G., McMillan, A. K., del Mar Sacau Cuadrado, M., Large, P. A., Kenny, A. J., Kenchington, E., and de Cárdenas González, E. 2012. An evaluation of benthic community structure in and around the Sackville Spur closed area (Northwest Atlantic) in relation to the protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 69: 213–222. The benthic macrofaunal community structure is investigated within and around a closed area at Sackville Spur in the Northwest Atlantic to ascertain whether continued exclusion of bottom fishing can be justified. This and other similar closed areas have been introduced by the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO) to protect areas of likely occurrence of taxa that are indicative of vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs) from the damaging effects of bottom-contact fishing gear. Results reveal subtle yet significant differences in macrofaunal assemblage composition and community structure between inside and outside the closed area, between above and below the 1200-m depth contour (i.e. the historical depth limit of fishing), and between areas where dense sponge spicule mats are either present or absent. Differences were observed in many assemblage metrics; however, the most revealing was the greater abundance, biomass, diversity, and number of VME indicative taxa inside the closed area than outside. Overall community composition is also significantly different between treatments. Depth, sediment temperature, and the proportion of clay within sediments are important in shaping the faunal assemblage. The importance of the effects of fishing is discussed, although it is not possible to ascertain if fishing is the direct cause behind observed differences in the macrofaunal assemblage. A continued closure of the area is recommended, as well as options for streamlining the evaluation process of other closed areas.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biological structures as a source of habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity on the deep ocean marginsMarine Ecology, 2010
- Impacts of bottom trawling on deep-coral ecosystems of seamounts are long-lastingMarine Ecology Progress Series, 2009
- Effect of deepwater trawling on the macro-invertebrate assemblages of seamounts on the Chatham Rise, New ZealandDeep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 2009
- Dispersion-based weighting of species counts in assemblage analysesMarine Ecology Progress Series, 2006
- Bio-physical coupling in the formation of zooplankton and fish aggregations over abrupt topographiesJournal of Marine Systems, 2004
- Bioturbation, ecosystem functioning and community structureHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2002
- Factors Controlling Soft Bottom Macrofauna Along and Across European Continental Margins2002
- Effects of Otter Trawling on a Benthic Community in Monterey Bay National Marine SanctuaryConservation Biology, 1998
- The influenceof hexactinellid sponge (Pheronema carpenteri) spicules on the patchy distribution of macrobenthos in the porcupine seabight (bathyal ne atlantic)Ophelia, 1992
- Corals on seamount peaks provide evidence of current acceleration over deep-sea topographyNature, 1986