A benchmark comparison of deterministic and probabilistic methods for defining manual review datasets in duplicate records reconciliation
Open Access
- 1 January 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 21 (1) , 97-104
Abstract
Introduction Clinical databases require accurate entity resolution (ER). One approach is to use algorithms that assign questionable cases to manual rKeywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Missing values in deduplication of electronic patient dataJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2012
- Evaluation of record linkage between a large healthcare provider and the Utah Population DatabaseJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2012
- Extending the Fellegi–Sunter probabilistic record linkage method for approximate field comparatorsJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2010
- An Empiric Modification to the Probabilistic Record Linkage Algorithm Using Frequency-Based Weight ScalingJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2009
- What is the expectation maximization algorithm?Nature Biotechnology, 2008
- Record linkage software in the public domain: a comparison of Link Plus, The Link King, and a `basic' deterministic algorithmHealth Informatics Journal, 2008
- A Bayesian decision model for cost optimal record matchingThe VLDB Journal, 2003
- An empirical comparison of record linkage proceduresStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Exploring the Utility of Demographic Data and Vaccination History Data in the Deduplication of Immunization Registry Patient RecordsJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2001
- Advances in Record-Linkage Methodology as Applied to Matching the 1985 Census of Tampa, FloridaJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1989