Fourth Generation Evaluation of Health Services: Exploring a Methodology That Offers Equal Voice to Consumer and Professional Stakeholders
Authors:
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Qualitative Health Research
- Vol. 9 (5) , 698-710
Abstract
This article explores the need for a clear understanding of fourth generation evaluation as a necessary requirement for those hoping to achieve an effective analysis of health services. The weaknesses of the traditional approaches to evaluation are fully examined so that an effective choice of evaluation methodology can be made. Current health service thinking highlights the need to recognize the importance of both consumer and professional stakeholders, allowing each an equal voice. The authors aim to assist evaluators to select a methodology that will be the most effective medium for allowing this to occur.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Constructivism: A Naturalistic Methodology for Nursing InquiryAdvances in Nursing Science, 1997
- The biomedical construction of ageing: implications for nursing care of older peopleJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1996
- National survey of hospital patientsBMJ, 1994
- Beyond measurement: fourth‐generation evaluation in nursingJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1994
- Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trailJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1994
- Measuring the quality of nursing care: a consideration of different approachesJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1990
- On your own with naturalistic evaluationNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986
- Naturalistic inquiryInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1985
- On the Differences Between Scientific and Artistic Approaches to Qualitative ResearchEducational Researcher, 1981