Comparing regional infant death rates: the influence of preterm births <24 weeks of gestation
Open Access
- 9 June 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
- Vol. 98 (2) , F103-F107
Abstract
Objective: To investigate regional variation in the registration of preterm births <24 weeks of gestation and the impact on infant death rates for English Primary Care Trusts (PCTs). Design: Cohort study. Setting: England. Participants: All registered births (1 January 2005–31 December 2008) by gestational age and PCT (147 trusts) linked to infant deaths (up to 1 year of life). Late-fetal deaths at 22 and 23 weeks gestation (1 January 2005–31 December 2006). Main outcome measures: Extremely preterm (<24 weeks) birth rate per 1000 live births and percentage of births registered as live born by PCT. Infant death rate and rank of mortality for (1) all live births and (2) live births over 24 weeks gestation by PCT. Results: Wide between-PCT variation existed in extremely preterm birth (<24 weeks) rates (per 1000 births) (90% central range (0.31, 1.91)) and percentages of births <24 weeks of gestation registered as live born (median 52.6%, 90% central range (26.3%, 79.5%)). Consequently, the percentage of infant deaths arising from these births varied (90% central range (6.7%, 31.9%)). Excluding births <24 weeks, led to significant changes in infant mortality rankings of PCTs, with a median worsening of 12 places for PCTs with low rates of live born preterm births <24 weeks of gestation compared with a median improvement of four ranks for those with higher live birth registration rates. Conclusions: Infant death rates in PCTs in England are influenced by variation in the registration of births where viability is uncertain. It is vital that this variation is minimised before infant mortality is used as indicator for monitoring health and performance and targeting interventions.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating and comparing neonatal outcomesArchives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 2009
- What factors predict differences in infant and perinatal mortality in primary care trusts in England? A prognostic modelBMJ, 2009
- Survival of extremely premature babies in a geographically defined population: prospective cohort study of 1994-9 compared with 2000-5BMJ, 2008
- No Improvement in Outcome of Nationwide Extremely Low Birth Weight Infant Populations Between 1996–1997 and 1999–2000Pediatrics, 2007
- Extremely Growth-Retarded Infants: Is There a Viability Centile?Pediatrics, 2006
- The EPIBEL Study: Outcomes to Discharge From Hospital for Extremely Preterm Infants in BelgiumPediatrics, 2004
- Methodological difficulties in the comparison of indicators of perinatal health across EuropeEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2003
- Non-viable delivery at 20–23 weeks gestation: observations and signs of life after birthArchives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 2003
- Registration artifacts in international comparisons of infant mortalityPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2002
- The Perinatal Mortality Rate as an Indicator of Quality of Care in International ComparisonsMedical Care, 1998