Differential exposure and differential vulnerability as counteracting forces linking the psychosocial work environment to socioeconomic health differences
Authors:
- 11 October 2009
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 64 (10) , 866-873
Abstract
Background In this article, the link between (1) psychosocial working conditions (job demands, job autonomy, task variation, social support), (2) self-reported health (persistent fatigue, musculoskeletal complaints, emotional well-being) and (3) socioeconomic position (skill levels, occupational status) is explored. The two theoretical pathways linking the psychosocial work environment to socioeconomic differences in health are explored: differential exposure and differential vulnerability. Previously, the focus has often been on social inequalities in exposure to the stressors. The pathway of differential vulnerability in different socioeconomic positions is often neglected. Methods In a representative cross-sectional sample of 11 099 Flemish (Belgian) wage earners, 16–65 years of age (47.5% women), logit modelling is applied. Results Higher exposure to psychosocial occupational stressors is associated with a higher prevalence of adverse health outcomes. Lower skill levels and subordinate occupational positions show a higher prevalence of musculoskeletal complaints, but not of persistent fatigue or emotional well-being. High demands, job strain and iso-strain are more common in higher-skilled, supervisory and managerial positions, but have the strongest health-damaging effects in lower socioeconomic positions. Low control is more prevalent in lower-skilled and subordinate positions, while having stronger adverse health effects in higher socioeconomic positions—the same holds for social support, although it has no clear socioeconomic distribution. Conclusion Differential exposure and differential vulnerability constitute two counteracting forces in constituting the association between the psychosocial work environment and socioeconomic differences in self-reported health complaints among wage earners.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- The structuring of occupational stressors in a Post-Fordist work environment. Moving beyond traditional accounts of demand, control and supportSocial Science & Medicine, 2009
- Psychosocial working conditions and self-reported health in a representative sample of wage-earners: a test of the different hypotheses of the Demand–Control–Support–ModelInternational Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2008
- Incidence and Risk Factors of Neck Discomfort: A 6-month Sedentary-worker Cohort StudyJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2007
- Epidemiologic surveillance of upper‐extremity musculoskeletal disorders in the working populationArthritis Care & Research, 2006
- Occupations associated with a high risk of self-reported back pain: representative outcomes of a back pain prevalence study in the Federal Republic of GermanyEuropean Spine Journal, 2006
- Psychosocial work characteristics in relation to neck and upper limb symptomsPain, 2005
- Work load and work hours in relation to disturbed sleep and fatigue in a large representative sampleJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 2002
- The relationship between psychosocial work characteristics and fatigue and psychological distressInternational Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2002
- Psychosocial work environment and psychological well‐being: assessment of the buffering effects in the job demand–control (–support) model in BELSTRESSStress and Health, 2002
- Why negative affectivity should not be controlled in job stress research: don't throw out the baby with the bath waterJournal of Organizational Behavior, 2000