Pre-Resection Endoscopic Features in T1 Colorectal Cancer Selected for Salvage Surgery After ESD/EID: An Exploratory Comparison of SM1 and SM2–3 Invasion
Authors:
- Kasper MaryńczakKMKasper Maryńczak
- Julia AdamkiewiczJAJulia Adamkiewicz
- Jacek KabzińskiJKJacek Kabziński
- Aleksandra OsielczakAOAleksandra Osielczak
- Przemysław KasprzykPKPrzemysław Kasprzyk
- Adam DzikiADAdam Dziki
- Michał SpychalskiMSMichał Spychalski
- Ireneusz MajsterekIMIreneusz Majsterek
- Łukasz DzikiŁDŁukasz Dziki
Open Access
- 2 October 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 15 (19) , 7634
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Accurate assessment of submucosal invasion is important when selecting patients with early colorectal cancer for organ-preserving treatment. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID) enable en bloc resection and detailed histopathological assessment. This study explored whether routinely recorded pre-resection endoscopic characteristics differed between SM1 and SM2–3 lesions within a selected cohort of patients who underwent salvage surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients with T1 colorectal cancer who underwent ESD or EID and subsequently underwent salvage surgery because of non-curative histopathological findings. Among the 43 included patients, 37 underwent ESD and 6 underwent EID. Pre-resection Paris morphology and pit-pattern classification were compared according to final histopathological depth of submucosal invasion. Exploratory univariable logistic regression was used to examine associations with SM2–3 invasion. Results: Five patients had SM1 invasion and 38 had SM2–3 invasion. No statistically significant differences in the evaluated baseline or endoscopic variables were observed between the two groups. Exploratory regression estimates were imprecise, with wide confidence intervals, reflecting the small number of SM1 cases. Conclusions: In this selected cohort of patients undergoing salvage surgery after non-curative ESD/EID, Paris morphology and pit-pattern classification did not show statistically significant differences between SM1 and SM2–3 lesions. Because curatively treated patients were not included and only five patients had SM1 invasion, these findings do not estimate the diagnostic performance of these classifications in the broader pre-resection population and should be considered hypothesis-generating.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2024 for the treatment of colorectal cancerInternational Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2025
- Circulating DNA methylation-based diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in colorectal cancerScientific Reports, 2025
- Assessing the Colorectal Cancer Landscape: A Comprehensive Exploration of Future Trends in 216 Countries and Territories from 2021 to 2040Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 2025
- Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2024Endoscopy, 2024
- Management after non-curative endoscopic resection of T1 rectal cancerBest Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 2024
- The emerging role of blood-based biomarkers in early detection of colorectal cancer: A systematic reviewCancer Treatment and Research Communications, 2024
- Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West: A systematic review and meta-analysisEndoscopy International Open, 2023
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2022Endoscopy, 2022
- EMR and ESD: Indications, techniques and resultsSurgical Oncology, 2022
- Rising incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer — a call to actionNature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2020