China's Janus-faced Approach toSu ZhiEducation: A Capability Perspective
Author:
- 4 March 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Human Development and Capabilities
- Vol. 15 (4) , 308-319
Abstract
Su zhi education has been adopted in schools in China to correct the overemphasis on test scores and to promote whole-person development. Although su zhi reform is not based on a capability approach, using such an approach helps to reveal the internal contradiction of the policy framework. A comprehensive analysis of the policy demonstrates that China's su zhi policy is Janus-faced, as it merely pays “lip-service” to capability development while establishing several road-blocks to prevent Chinese schools from embracing a holistic approach to education. In doing this the paper contributes to the literature on the capability approach by summarizing a tentative list of irreducible core capabilities in the Chinese context. Given the lack of research on China as a case, the discussion on the capabilities derived from su zhi education policy provides a reference point for future research.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- ‘Operationalizing’ the Capability Approach as a Basis for Equality and Human Rights Monitoring in Twenty‐first‐century BritainJournal of Human Development and Capabilities, 2011
- Should We Promote Patriotism in Schools?Political Studies, 2010
- Curriculum reform and ‘Quality Education’ in China: An overviewInternational Journal of Educational Development, 2009
- Suzhi: A Keyword ApproachThe China Quarterly, 2006
- Turning Peasants into Modern Chinese Citizens: “Population Quality” Discourse, Demographic Transition and Primary EducationThe China Quarterly, 2004
- THE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT PARADIGM: OPERATIONALIZING SEN'S IDEAS ON CAPABILITIESFeminist Economics, 2003
- Valuing Freedoms2002
- Women and Human Development2000
- Asian Values, Education and DevelopmentCompare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1996
- Radicalism and Education Reform in 20th-Century China1996