Lamivudine monotherapy in HIV-1-infected patients harbouring a lamivudine-resistant virus: a randomized pilot study (E-184V study)
Authors:
- Antonella CastagnaACAntonella Castagna
- Anna DaniseADAnna Danise
- Stefano MenzoStefano Menzo
- Laura GalliLGLaura Galli
- Nicola GianottiNGNicola Gianotti
- Elisabetta CariniECElisabetta Carini
- Enzo BoeriEBEnzo Boeri
- Andrea GalliAGAndrea Galli
- Massimo CernuschiMCMassimo Cernuschi
- Hamid HassonHHHamid Hasson
- Massimo ClementiMCMassimo Clementi
- Adriano LazzarinALAdriano Lazzarin
- 4 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in AIDS
- Vol. 20 (6) , 795-803
Abstract
We compared the immunological and clinical outcomes of lamivudine monotherapy and complete therapy interruption in the treatment of HIV-1-infected patients harbouring lamivudine-resistant virus. This 48-week, open-label pilot study randomly assigned HIV-infected patients receiving lamivudine-containing HAART and harbouring the M184V mutation to monotherapy with lamivudine 300 mg once daily (lamivudine group) or the discontinuation of all antiretroviral drugs (TI group). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of immunological or clinical failure; immunological failure was defined as the first report of a CD4 T-cell count less than 350 cells/μl, and clinical failure as the occurrence of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention grade B or C event. The data were analysed on the basis of the intention-to-treat principle. By week 48, 20 of 29 patients in the TI group (69%; 95% CI 51–83%) and 12 of 29 in the lamivudine group (41%; 95% CI 26–59%) had discontinued the study because of immunological or clinical failure, which was significantly delayed in the lamivudine group (P = 0.018). Only patients in the TI group (6/29, 20.7%) experienced grade 3–4 clinical adverse events at least possibly related to HIV-1 (P = 0.02). The mean decline in CD4 cell percentage, viral rebound and recovery of HIV-1 replication capacity were significantly lower in the lamivudine group. The 24-week virological and immunological response after therapy resumption in patients who prematurely discontinued the study was similar in the two groups. In HIV-1-infected patients harbouring a lamivudine-resistant virus, lamivudine monotherapy may lead to a better immunological and clinical outcome than complete therapy interruption.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- No benefit of a structured treatment interruption based on genotypic resistance in heavily pretreated HIV-infected patientsAIDS, 2005
- Structured treatment interruption in HIV-infected patients failing on multidrug therapy: is there a future for this strategy?AIDS, 2005
- Interruption of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV Clinical PracticeJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2005
- Benefit of treatment interruption in HIV-infected patients with multiple therapeutic failuresAIDS, 2004
- Role of Structured Treatment Interruption before a 5‐Drug Salvage Antiretroviral Regimen: The Retrogene StudyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Structured Treatment Interruption in Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Human Immunodeficiency VirusNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Persistence of drug-resistant HIV-1 after a structured treatment interruption and its impact on treatment responseAIDS, 2003
- Virologic and Immunologic Consequences of Discontinuing Combination Antiretroviral-Drug Therapy in HIV-Infected Patients with Detectable ViremiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Enhanced Fidelity of 3TC-Selected Mutant HIV-1 Reverse TranscriptaseScience, 1996
- Rapid Changes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 RNA Load and Appearance of Drug-Resistant Virus Populations in Persons Treated with Lamivudine (3TC)The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1995