Age and gender related patterns in carotid-femoral PWV and carotid and femoral stiffness in a large healthy, middle-aged population
Authors:
- Sebastian J VermeerschSVSebastian J Vermeersch
- Ernst R RietzschelERErnst R Rietzschel
- Marc L De BuyzereMBMarc L De Buyzere
- Dirk De BacquerDBDirk De Bacquer
- Guy De BackerGBGuy De Backer
- Luc M Van BortelLBLuc M Van Bortel
- Thierry C GillebertTGThierry C Gillebert
- Pascal R VerdonckPVPascal R Verdonck
- Patrick SegersPSPatrick Segers
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal Of Hypertension
- Vol. 26 (7) , 1411-1419
Abstract
The relationship between aortic (carotid–femoral) pulse wave velocity and stiffness measures based on local diameter and pressure readings is not yet fully understood. We compared the relationship with age and gender of aortic pulse wave velocity to stiffness indices (compliance and distensibility coefficient) evaluated at the common carotid and femoral arteries in 2195 (1131 women) apparently healthy subjects, aged 35–55 years participating in the Asklepios study. Aortic pulse wave velocity was further compared with previously reported central arterial stiffness parameters on the same population. Subjects were divided into four age groups for analysis. Femoral arterial stiffness was higher in men than in women (P < 0.001) but did not change with age and no age–gender interaction was evident. Carotid arterial stiffness increased with age (P < 0.001) and showed a significant (P < 0.001) age–gender interaction, with carotid stiffness increasing more rapidly in women than in men, crossing over around the age of 45. Aortic pulse wave velocity did not differ between men and women, but did increase with age (P < 0.001). No age–gender interaction was evident. The relation with age and gender of local and central stiffness measures is not the same over the age range 35–55 in apparently healthy men and women. Depending on the central stiffness parameter used, age–gender effects evident at the carotid artery are or are not found centrally. Though the relevance of these differences requires further evaluation in a longitudinal study with outcome data, they need to be kept in mind when designing or interpreting results from arterial stiffness evaluation studies.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applicationsEuropean Heart Journal, 2006
- Arterial Stiffness and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and StrokeCirculation, 2006
- Elevated Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity, a Marker of Arterial Stiffness, Predicts Cardiovascular Events in Well-Functioning Older AdultsCirculation, 2005
- Pulse Wave Velocity Predicts Cardiovascular Mortality-Findings From the Hawaii-Los Angeles-Hiroshima Study-Circulation Journal, 2005
- Aortic Stiffness Is an Independent Predictor of Fatal Stroke in Essential HypertensionStroke, 2003
- Aortic Pulse-Wave Velocity and Its Relationship to Mortality in Diabetes and Glucose IntoleranceCirculation, 2002
- Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Predicts Cardiovascular Mortality in Subjects >70 Years of AgeArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2001
- Aortic Stiffness Is an Independent Predictor of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Hypertensive PatientsHypertension, 2001
- Pulse wave velocity as endpoint in large-scale intervention trial. The Complior® studyJournal Of Hypertension, 2001
- Impact of Aortic Stiffness on Survival in End-Stage Renal DiseaseCirculation, 1999