Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 26 July 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design
- Vol. 1 (1) , 1633-1642
Abstract
Systematic literature reviews (SRs) are a way of synthesising scientific evidence to answer a particular research question in a way that is transparent and reproducible, while seeking to include all published evidence on the topic and appraising the quality of this evidence. SRs have become a major methodology in disciplines such as public policy research and health sciences. Some have advocated that design research should adopt the method. However, little guidance is available. This paper provides an overview of the SR method, based on the literature in health sciences. Then, the rationale for SRs in design research is explored, and four recent examples of SRs in design research are analysed to illustrate current practice. Foreseen challenges in taking forward the SR method in design research are highlighted, and directions for developing a SR method for design research are proposed. It is concluded that SRs hold potential for design research and could help us in addressing some important issues, but work is needed to define what review methods are appropriate for each type of research question in design research, and to adapt guidance to our own needs and specificities.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clarifying differences between review designs and methodsSystematic Reviews, 2012
- A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposedJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?PLOS Medicine, 2010
- Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existenceLearned Publishing, 2010
- Can We Systematically Review Studies That Evaluate Complex Interventions?PLOS Medicine, 2009
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and ElaborationPLOS Medicine, 2009
- Reinventing the future: adding design science to the repertoire of organization and management studiesOrganization Management Journal, 2009
- Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sourcesBMJ, 2005
- Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic ReviewBritish Journal of Management, 2003
- Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusionsBMJ, 2003