RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres
Open Access
- 26 October 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Cancer
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-11
Abstract
Treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include anti-epithelial growth factor therapies, which, in Europe, are indicated in patients with RAS wild-type tumours only and require prior mutation testing of “hot-spot” codons in exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of RAS testing methods and estimate the RAS mutation prevalence in mCRC patients. Overall, 194 pathology laboratories were invited to complete an online survey. Participating laboratories were asked to provide information on their testing practices and aggregated RAS mutation data from 20 to 30 recently tested patients with mCRC. A total of 96 (49.5 %) laboratories across 24 European countries completed the survey. All participants tested KRAS exon 2, codons 12 and 13. Seventy (72.9 %) laboratories reported complete testing of all RAS hot-spot codons, and three (3.1 %) reported only testing KRAS exon 2. Sixty-nine (71.9 %) laboratories reported testing >80 patients yearly for RAS mutation status. Testing was typically performed within the reporting institution (93.8 %, n = 90), at the request of a treating oncologist (89.5 %, n = 85); testing methodology varied by laboratory and by individual codon tested. For laboratory RAS testing, turnaround times were ≤10 working days for the majority of institutions (90.6 %, n = 87). The overall crude RAS mutation prevalence was 48.5 % (95 % confidence interval: 46.4–50.6) for laboratories testing all RAS hot-spot codons. Prevalence estimates varied significantly by primary tumour location, approximate number of patients tested yearly and indication given for RAS testing. Our findings indicate a rapid uptake of RAS testing in the majority of European pathology laboratories.Keywords
Funding Information
- Amgen
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- External Quality Assessment Unravels Interlaboratory Differences in Quality of RAS Testing for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Colorectal CancerThe Oncologist, 2015
- Extended RAS mutations and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody survival benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trialsAnnals of Oncology, 2014
- The role of personalized medicine in metastatic colorectal cancer: an evolving landscapeTherapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, 2013
- Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012European Journal of Cancer, 2013
- Sanger sequencing in routine KRAS testing: a review of 1720 cases from a pathologist's perspectiveJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2012
- Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancerNature, 2012
- Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer: A ReviewCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2012
- Risk Factors for the Development of Metachronous Liver Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer Patients After Curative ResectionWorld Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Wild-Type KRAS Is Required for Panitumumab Efficacy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Impact of Kras and Tp53 Mutations on Survival in Patients With Left- and Right-Sided Dukes' C Colon CancerAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2000