Variation in management of humeral and clavicular shaft fractures amongst fellowship trained orthopedic traumatologists
Authors:
Open Access
- 18 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Vol. 21 (1) , 1-5
Abstract
Background: There exists a wide variety of opinions on the appropriate management of diaphyseal humeral and clavicular fractures amongst orthopedic surgeons. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a preference amongst orthopedic traumatologists on treatment of diaphyseal humerus and clavicle fractures with respect to various patient populations. Methods: A 6-question survey was created using Surveymonkey.com and distributed via the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) website to fellowship trained orthopedic surgery traumatologists to survey the preferred management of a simple oblique middle 1/3rd diaphyseal humerus fracture and a middle 1/3rd displaced diaphyseal clavicle fracture in the following 3 clinical settings: a healthy laborer, an older patient with co-morbidities, and if the surgeon themselves sustained the injury. The ratio of operative to non-operative management was calculated for all 6 questions. A chi-square value was performed to determine if the results are clinically significant based on the clinical scenario. Results: There was 56 responses to the survey that were included in the analysis. Overall, there was a statistically significant trend towards surgical management of the surgeon’s own diaphyseal humerus fractures (55%) compared to that of healthy patients (41%) and those with medical comorbidities (21%) (p = 0.02) A similar trend was noted for operative management for diaphyseal clavicle fractures by the surgeon on their own fractures (43%) compared to that of healthy patients (38%) and those with medical comorbidities (18%) (p = 0.02). Conclusion: While there are an increasing number of relative indications for treatment of diaphyseal humerus shaft and clavicle fractures, the results of this survey indicate that fellow-ship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons prefer surgical management of simple humerus and clavicular fractures in young, healthy patients as well as in themselves.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radiological and functional outcomes 2.7 years following conservatively treated completely displaced midshaft clavicle fracturesArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2015
- Intramedullary Nail Versus Plate Fixation for Humeral Shaft FracturesMedicine, 2015
- Acute and chronic humeral shaft fractures in adultsOrthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 2015
- Nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures revisitedJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2015
- Displaced Mid-Shaft Clavicle Fractures: A Subset For Surgical TreatmentMalaysian Orthopaedic Journal, 2014
- Operative versus non-operative treatment for clavicle fracture: a meta-analysisInternational Orthopaedics, 2013
- Lengthening Over a Retrograde Nail Using 3 Schanz PinsJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2013
- Contact Pressure and Glenohumeral Translation Following Subacromial Decompression: How Much Is Enough?Orthopedics, 2010
- Fractures of the shaft of the humerusThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2006
- Functional Bracing for the Treatment of Fractures of the Humeral Diaphysis*Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2000