Integrating Cropping Systems with Cultural Techniques Augments Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Management in Barley
Authors:
- K. Neil HarkerKHK. Neil Harker
- John T. O'DonovanJOJohn T. O'Donovan
- R. Byron IrvineRIR. Byron Irvine
- T. Kelly TurkingtonTTT. Kelly Turkington
- George W. ClaytonGCGeorge W. Clayton
- 1 June 2009
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Weed Science
- Vol. 57 (3) , 326-337
Abstract
Wild oat causes more crop yield losses and accounts for more herbicide expenditures than any other weed species on the Canadian Prairies. A study was conducted from 2001 to 2005 at four Canadian Prairie locations to determine the influence of repeated cultural and herbicidal management practices on wild oat population density, biomass, and seed production, and on barley biomass and seed yield. Short or tall cultivars of barley were combined with normal or double barley seeding rates in continuous barley or a barley–canola–barley–field-pea rotation under three herbicide rate regimes. The same herbicide rate regime was applied to the same plots in all crops each year. In barley, cultivar type and seeding rate were also repeated on the same plots year after year. Optimal cultural practices (tall cultivars, double seeding rates, and crop rotation) reduced wild oat emergence, biomass, and seed production, and increased barley biomass and seed yield, especially at low herbicide rates. Wild oat seed production at the quarter herbicide rate was reduced by 91, 95, and 97% in 2001, 2003, and 2005, respectively, when tall barley cultivars at double seeding rates were rotated with canola and field pea (high management) compared to short barley cultivars at normal seeding rates continuously planted to barley (low management). Combinations of favorable cultural practices interacted synergistically to reduce wild oat emergence, biomass and seed production, and to increase barley yield. For example, at the quarter herbicide rate, wild oat biomass was reduced 2- to 3-, 6- to 7-, or 19-fold when optimal single, double, or triple treatments were combined, respectively. Barley yield reductions in the low-management scenario were somewhat compensated for by full herbicide rates. However, high management at low herbicide rates often produced more barley than low management in higher herbicide rate regimes.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ongoing Development of Integrated Weed Management Systems on the Canadian PrairiesWeed Science, 2008
- The ability of 29 barley cultivars to compete and withstand competitionWeed Science, 2006
- Wheat Seeding Rate Influences Herbicide Performance in Wild Oat (Avena fatua L.)Agronomy Journal, 2006
- Integrated weed management strategies for delaying herbicide resistance in wild oatsPhytoprotection, 2005
- Integration of Agronomic Practices and Herbicides for Sustainable Weed Management in a Zero-Till Barley Field Pea Rotation1Weed Technology, 2005
- Crop Seeding Rate Influences the Performance of Variable Herbicide Rates in a Canola–Barley–Canola RotationWeed Technology, 2004
- Effect of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) emergence date on growth and fecundity in soybeanWeed Science, 2004
- Weed life history: identifying vulnerabilities2001
- Effect of barley plant density on wild oat interference, shoot biomass and seed yield under zero tillageCanadian Journal of Plant Science, 1999
- Weed management in conservation tillage systems for wheat production in North and South AmericaCrop Protection, 1994