Effect of clear aligner therapy on the buccolingual inclination of mandibular canines and the intercanine distance
- 1 January 2016
- journal article
- Published by The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation) in The Angle Orthodontist
- Vol. 86 (1) , 10-16
Abstract
Objective: : To compare the changes in buccolinugal inclination of mandibular canines and intercanine distance in patients treated with clear aligners to those treated with preadjusted edgewise appliances. Materials and Methods: : The buccolingual inclination of mandibular canines and the intercanine distance were measured on pre- and posttreatment cone-beam computed tomograms of 30 patients who had been treated with clear aligners and 30 patients who had been treated with fixed preadjusted edgewise appliances. Differences between the aligner and fixed appliance groups and between pre- and posttreatment measurements were tested for statistical significance. Results: : In both groups, most of the mandibular canines had positive buccolingual inclinations (ie, their crowns were positioned lateral to their roots) both before and after treatment. While there was no difference between the groups pretreatment, the posttreatment buccolingual inclination was significantly greater in the aligner group. In the fixed appliance group, the canines became more upright with treatment, while the buccolingual inclination did not change significantly in the clear aligner group. The intercanine distance did not differ between the groups either before or after treatment. However, it increased significantly over the course of treatment in the aligner group, whereas it did not change significantly in the fixed appliance group. Conclusions: : Orthodontic treatment with clear aligners tends to increase the mandibular intercanine distance with little change in inclination in contrast to treatment with fixed appliances, which leaves the intercanine distance unchanged but leads to more upright mandibular canines.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique – regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalizationBMC Oral Health, 2014
- Invisible orthodontics part 1: invisalignDental Update, 2013
- Invisalign®, an innovative invisible orthodontic appliance to correct malocclusions: advantages and limitationsDental Update, 2012
- Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scansThe Angle Orthodontist, 2011
- Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomographyAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2011
- How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with InvisalignAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2009
- Effect of buccolingual root angulation on the mesiodistal angulation shown on panoramic radiographsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2008
- Periodontal status of mandibular central incisors after orthodontic proclination in adultsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2006
- Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading systemAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2005
- Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1998