VFMA: Topographic Analysis of Sensitivity Data From Full-Field Static Perimetry
Open Access
- 1 March 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) in Translational Vision Science & Technology
- Vol. 4 (2) , 14
Abstract
Purpose:: To analyze static visual field sensitivity with topographic models of the hill of vision (HOV), and to characterize several visual function indices derived from the HOV volume. Methods:: A software application, Visual Field Modeling and Analysis (VFMA), was developed for static perimetry data visualization and analysis. Three-dimensional HOV models were generated for 16 healthy subjects and 82 retinitis pigmentosa patients. Volumetric visual function indices, which are measures of quantity and comparable regardless of perimeter test pattern, were investigated. Cross-validation, reliability, and cross-sectional analyses were performed to assess this methodology and compare the volumetric indices to conventional mean sensitivity and mean deviation. Floor effects were evaluated by computer simulation. Results:: Cross-validation yielded an overall R2 of 0.68 and index of agreement of 0.89, which were consistent among subject groups, indicating good accuracy. Volumetric and conventional indices were comparable in terms of test–retest variability and discriminability among subject groups. Simulated floor effects did not negatively impact the repeatability of any index, but large floor changes altered the discriminability for regional volumetric indices. Conclusions:: VFMA is an effective tool for clinical and research analyses of static perimetry data. Topographic models of the HOV aid the visualization of field defects, and topographically derived indices quantify the magnitude and extent of visual field sensitivity. Translational Relevance:: VFMA assists with the interpretation of visual field data from any perimetric device and any test location pattern. Topographic models and volumetric indices are suitable for diagnosis, monitoring of field loss, patient counseling, and endpoints in therapeutic trials.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Retinitis Pigmentosa and Allied Disorders2013
- The Physics and Psychophysics of MicroperimetryOptometry and Vision Science, 2012
- Comparison Between MP‐1 and Humphrey Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma and Retinitis PigmentosaOptometry and Vision Science, 2012
- Morphometric Analysis and Classification of Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Using Radial PolynomialsJournal of Glaucoma, 2012
- The Effective Dynamic Ranges of Standard Automated Perimetry Sizes III and V and Motion and Matrix PerimetryArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 2010
- Autosomal dominant pericentral retinal dystrophy caused by a novel missense mutation in the TOPORS geneActa Ophthalmologica, 2010
- Recurrent Mutation in the First Zinc Finger of the Orphan Nuclear Receptor NR2E3 Causes Autosomal Dominant Retinitis PigmentosaThe American Journal of Human Genetics, 2007
- Effect of stimulus size on static visual fields in patients with retinitis pigmentosaOphthalmology, 2000
- Yearly rates of rod and cone functional loss in retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy11The authors have no financial interest in any aspect of this study.Ophthalmology, 1999
- Relationship Between Difficulty in Performing Daily Activities and Clinical Measures of Visual Function in Patients With Retinitis PigmentosaArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1997