Cognitive and affective processes in children’s third-party punishment
Open Access
- 10 January 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 78 (10) , 2091-2109
Abstract
This study investigated how children’s punishment affective states change over time, as well as when children begin to prioritise intentions over outcomes in their punishment decisions. Whereas most prior research sampled children from Anglo-America or Northwestern Europe, we tested 5- to 11-year-old children from Colombia and Spain ( N = 123). We focused on punishment behaviour in response to ostensibly real moral transgressions, rather than punishment recommendations for hypothetical moral transgressions. We employed moral scenarios involving disloyalty (group-focused moral domain) and unfairness (individual-focused moral domain). Regarding punishment affective states, on average, children did not derive much enjoyment from administering punishment, nor did they anticipate that punishment would feel good. Thus, children did not make the same emotional forecasting error adults commonly commit. Regarding the cognitive integration of outcomes and intentions, children began to punish failed intentional transgressions more harshly than accidental transgression, in both disloyalty and unfairness scenarios, much earlier than in previous behavioural studies: around 7 years of age rather than in late adolescence. This could be due to the lower processing demands and higher intention salience of our paradigm. Exploratory analyses revealed that children showed higher concern for disloyalty than unfairness. Punishment of disloyalty remained relatively stable in severity with increasing age, while punishment of unfairness decreased in severity. This suggests that the relative importance of moral concerns for the individual vs. the group may shift because of culture-directed learning processes.Keywords
Funding Information
- Nigel Groome Studentship
- Internal research funding from the Faculty of Social Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia
- Santander Research Scholarship
This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gender Differences Concerning the Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism: A Meta-AnalysisPsychological Studies, 2022
- Dual-Process Theories, Cognitive Decoupling and the Outcome-to-Intent Shift: A Developmental Perspective on Evolutionary Ethics2021
- Distinct affective responses to second- and third-party norm violationsActa Psychologica, 2020
- What stops revenge taking? Effects of observed emotional reactions on revenge seekingAggressive Behavior, 2020
- Five‐year‐olds punish antisocial adultsAggressive Behavior, 2015
- Moral Foundations Theory2013
- What gives victims satisfaction when they seek revenge?European Journal of Social Psychology, 2010
- A Closer Look at an Eye for an Eye: Laypersons’ Punishment Decisions Are Primarily Driven by Retributive MotivesSocial Justice Research, 2010
- The role of mental state understanding in the development of moral cognition and moral actionNew Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2004
- Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groupsEthology and Sociobiology, 1992