Full-Thickness Tumor Resection of Oral Cancer Involving the Facial Skin—Microsurgical Reconstruction of Extensive Defects after Radical Treatment of Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Authors:
Open Access
Abstract
Advanced tumors of the head and neck are challenging for the treatment specialist due to the need to synergize oncological and functional requirements. Free flap reconstruction has been established as the standard of care for defects following tumor resection. However, depending on the affected anatomic subsite, advanced tumors may impose specific difficulties regarding reconstruction, especially when full-thickness resection is required. This study aimed to evaluate reconstructive strategies and oncological outcomes in patients with full-thickness resection of the oral cavity. A total of 33 patients with extensive defects due to squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity were identified. Indications, reconstructive procedures, and clinical outcome were evaluated. Thirty-two patients (97%) presented locally advanced tumors (T3/T4). Complete tumor resection was achieved in 26 patients (78.8%). The anterolateral thigh flap was the most frequently used flap (47.1%), and the primary flap success rate was 84.8%. The cohort demonstrated a good local control rate and moderate overall and progression-free survival rates. Most patients regained full competence regarding oral alimentation and speech. Full-thickness tumor resections of the head and neck area may be necessary due to advanced tumors in critical anatomic areas. In many cases, radical surgical treatment leads to good oncological results. Free flap reconstruction has been shown to be a suitable option for extensive defects in aesthetically challenging regions.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 studyThe Lancet, 2019
- Outcomes following head neck free flap reconstruction requiring interposition vein graft or vascular bridge flapHead & Neck, 2019
- Nivolumab vs investigator’s choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 2-year long-term survival update of CheckMate 141 with analyses by tumor PD-L1 expressionOral Oncology, 2018
- Nivolumab versus standard, single-agent therapy of investigator's choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CheckMate 141): health-related quality-of-life results from a randomised, phase 3 trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2017
- Prognoses and improvement for head and neck cancers diagnosed in Europe in early 2000s: The EUROCARE-5 population-based studyEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2015
- Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012International Journal of Cancer, 2014
- Current Options in Head and Neck ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2006
- Review of 346 patients with free-flap reconstruction following head and neck surgery for neoplasmJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2006
- Functional Results of Primary Closure vs Flaps in Oropharyngeal ReconstructionJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1998
- Microvascular Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction: Report of 200 Cases and Review of ComplicationsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1994