Application of the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology to the evidence for developmental and reproductive toxicity of triclosan
Open Access
- 1 July 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Environment International
- Vol. 92-93, 716-728
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- CalEPA's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
- U.S. EPA (GAIA-0-6-UCSF 17288)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ESO22841)
- U.S. EPA STAR (RD83543301)
- Fred Gellert Foundation
- U.S. EPA
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
- U.S. Department of Energy
- U.S. EPA
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Urinary Triclosan is Associated with Elevated Body Mass Index in NHANESPLOS ONE, 2013
- Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Published Animal Studies: A Systematic ReviewEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2013
- A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical researchNature, 2012
- Systematic Survey of the Design, Statistical Analysis, and Reporting of Studies Published in the 2008 Volume of the Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and MetabolismJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 2010
- Investigation of Relationships between Urinary Biomarkers of Phytoestrogens, Phthalates, and Phenols and Pubertal Stages in GirlsEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2010
- Short-term Exposure to Triclosan Decreases Thyroxine In Vivo via Upregulation of Hepatic Catabolism in Young Long-Evans RatsToxicological Sciences, 2009
- Thyroid-Disrupting Chemicals: Interpreting Upstream Biomarkers of Adverse OutcomesEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2009
- Meeting Report: Moving Upstream—Evaluating Adverse Upstream End Points for Improved Risk Assessment and Decision-MakingEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2008
- Urinary Concentrations of Triclosan in the U.S. Population: 2003–2004Environmental Health Perspectives, 2008
- Meta‐analysis of cannabinoid ligand binding affinity and receptor distribution: interspecies differencesBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 2007