Is radiologists' volume of mammography reading related to accuracy? A critical review of the literature
Authors:
- S.M. MossSMS.M. Moss
- R.G. BlanksRBR.G. Blanks
- R.L. BennettRBR.L. Bennett
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Radiology
- Vol. 60 (6) , 623-626
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Screening Mammography in the United States and the United KingdomJAMA, 2003
- Performs: a self-assessment scheme for radiologists in breast screeningSeminars in Breast Disease, 2003
- Association of Volume and Volume-Independent Factors With Accuracy in Screening Mammogram InterpretationJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2003
- Improving the Accuracy of Mammography: Volume and Outcome RelationshipsJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002
- Standardized Abnormal Interpretation and Cancer Detection Ratios to Assess Reading Volume and Reader Performance in a Breast Screening ProgramRadiology, 2000
- Proficiency test for screening mammography: results for 117 volunteer Italian radiologistsJournal of Medical Screening, 1999
- Efficiency of cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening: two versus one view mammographyJournal of Medical Screening, 1998
- Does Diagnostic Accuracy in Mammography Depend on Radiologists' Experience?Journal of Women's Health, 1998
- Context BiasJAMA, 1996